CTA Case No. 1855 (Decision)
0 � - ... .... c 1 ,, :r f ( � or th o n ot 11 a ae
- �t .) c -� 7; 1 1 � l: 8 v~
1t t � :_. 8 6
.. X f �
~r . '�- ' .1; \t ~ ' ~ � vi ha 11 � to t ~-----__.:.- t e J.d. '"' td. uJ'e � of '� --~-----...... � � ti � J' t to 4 l< 1 t I t f.llP.g l ly 1 c� 11 ly � ,I � Sll1d c1 th a 11 v y � Coll Qt ~ o ao . n -t 1 arl I .. � r 1.n 88
~ -,'~"" ~ - '' ,. / 6 t at lr ., t �. t a11 u'l;'""""'' � t�1 � p� 5 t . . . ...J l 1t � OUgtt ari Pl111nptnes widcl\ to D Vi o Ci y P� 1 at aatd � 1 s tt1 to 1 Q t I P}!reh r � :finrli .nd c ts. pap ~~nd ~o s go ar. e 1 r t>Jt. t I lt ""d lfi oo. ql ot. r er an ~i;C <1 ~ vs 1 r. ea a~a ae1au. � ;. 89 ' '.
.'� t. ! t lt ' liC � , nnw , ru 1 ' r c t h(!rw se r t n l,it 1 1t <' 5 1 \1 1 n.. ~l . 616), b l. t t � r ht.t. o ,, 90
-- I ' / '� .!) ... ~..... '" {'' c l 1: ss 8 't � ,. (' 0 r� �J ' .~ 2 u. " � 3 3 l doc .~1 nutJ !at; ry t � o1 � � �� � 1 � 1- ' '' '" 91
- �1 1. :1 a � t � ' j � � � 1:�� 92
., tollo a 80 I ai e � 0 rs , � � � Z' t'f 11 cu. ,, 93
'I.:c.. 1 :~�!) I .' [ lt � �" ' to db.er to tbe t'Ul b ' e 1as1btl1� y ot � . 1d nc proc 1 glaa b � n e1 11 lle.na tb n he co ete ay ide ce � � petitio or r .iginal a .1on. lt upan 11 c i .o , th .- l �party in l tere an ta t h t , the . ocu .eut ry I a iaul'e, the ev1 nee will I 1 e r ~ta~p.'f our 1 tbe �� a ,, ow ei thotr'en~ l n �ct1on in cou t
1m .I to, - o. 1 5J C CASE 8 J d~ne lilA dCClltll!eltnS l �i n .. �). a:t 1 .ne t .. 0 � tid a C1 tr, � c, �� � � 1 at � ot y tor ,h � dth\e 4 n1 1 .nee . , t pl.' t.Em.t t' e ' 8 J'i .,. or ro � we a � hat ,, ,. 95 !.
., t t t -t � 0 r 0 tb
f 1 .- 1' 00 � � - �� 1 r1 t .� !' ,. 9 7
--- " .c .f 1 11n 98
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5215 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5215)
- MISSOURI SQUARE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8688)
- KEPCO ILIJAN CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9261)
- GULF AIR COMPANY, PHILIPPINE BRANCH (GF) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 302)
- VERTEX INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT AND EXCHANGE CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT RICARDO LUZ, v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1160)
- LUCIO L. CO, SUSAN P. CO, FERDINAND VINCENT P. CO and PAMELA JUSTINE P. CO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8831)
- DENSO TECHNO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7699)
- COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, represented by OIC-Regional Director, Maridur V. Rosario, Revenue Region No. 9A - CaBaMiRo, Sto. Tomas, Batangas, v. BASIC HOUSING SOLUTIONS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2723)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.