CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 574574 1964-10-30
CTA Case No. 574 (Decision)
/ r I ..Jtlfl1 :-' jJ-v;; / J ~.../ .. � � '-jo. r � 0 289
�? t l 1 1. � � , , ' ' 290 .
�7 1 .. � 291
�? . ... . � � � � � � �" ��� � � � � ' � ����� ~ ......... ( I � �) 0 .) y '! .. # t 1 ( . r t t 0t (1) n y (2) t0 ' , 292 ..
' ) 1 () .1 t0 r t p 1 t .. ' 0 1 �� t , ( .A. � I' 29 3
.- 294
� t 0 0. 0 . 295
� � t ' ' 296 �
J.. .L ' , � t 1 ' c 297
. :) i ,,,; 7 I t 1 298
� ' 0 / t 299
5 .. I ..... .. ( ' �t 300
1 ... � '- � � '� 3 01
More in CTA Decisions
- MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SAN JOSE DEL MONTE CITY and ANALIZA E. MENDIOLA, in her capacity as OIC-City Treasurer of San Jose Del Monte City(CTA Case No. AC-329)
- CTA Case No. 5136 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5136)
- THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF MANILA v. CITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-111)
- CTA Case No. 5355 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5355)
- BUILDERS STEEL CORPORATION v. Hon. KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES in her capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ALFREDO V. MISAJON and NESTOR S. VALEROSO in their capacity as OIC ? Assistant Commissioner Large Taxpayers Service, Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 9050)
- BENGUET CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5532)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8517)
- ACTIVE MULTI-MARKETING MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8744)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.