CTA Case No. 1179 (Decision)

, r � 17 c 17 1 ' t 1 1 � c ) 11 10 I' :' 10

.. � 11? � 1 ,. :�: 11

I 7 0 rd r � , .. --' - nt � r 1 �r

D CI 1'01 ... c . 1179 r cont nd t h 1 or t Co � 1 c1 n1 t , c� !cn f r do � o pply o t 1 c a t ot r 11 lly c l l cte � nd, citing th ot 11 Phipp (Msn 1 ), d. t v � c l otor or Int rn �1 � � � 1 9 1 5 � {' 7931) t1tton s that ,, pp,Uc bl �tat t or 11 1 t 11 0 11 ... � 11 hie r t h jud1e1 l et1o brou 1t n thi1"t7 (30) dy f'ro ot o� d 1 ion � c 1 .. fund. oh d, th in n1 PP nt O.t ! th ax str1 tl t 0 30 1 :n h t 1 enti on t eo 'I of ny n tio al ntern .l r-av ;nt � tax :rron ou - y o lle 11 � l <J d; the n1 c or a l l � �t � judie 1 to , to nfo II 13

, - � 117 1 ( )y r ' 1 1 ' � f 5) . I 0 � .. ' J 1 � f . 14

I - k r It - � 15

... 7 ' � n- t ,. � 1 ....i �1 ' c p1 1 1 r t 1 :J .� 1 ,. 16