[ G. R. No. 39383. May 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39383. May 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39383
[ G. R. No. 39383. May 16, 1934 ]
GREGORIO ATIENZA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ENRIQUE BAUTISTA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________6th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that ______xx__________xx__________xx______ recover from __________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-3827-28. November 23, 1951 ]
- G.R. No. 140688, January 26, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 133944. October 28, 1999 ](375 Phil. 1106)
- [ A.M. No. P-07-2330 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. P-03-1538-P). June 20, 2008 ](577 Phil. 159)
- [ G.R. No. 200405. February 26, 2020 ](871 Phil. 717)
- [ G.R. No. 230049. October 06, 2021 ](912 Phil. 595; 120 OG No. 29, 7337 (July 15, 2024))
- [ G.R. No. 2506. April 16, 1906 ](G.R. No. 2506)
- [ G.R. No. L-3027. October 03, 1950 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.