[ G. R. No. 38641. June 18, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38641. June 18, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38641
[ G. R. No. 38641. June 18, 1934 ]
ROMAN SUSANA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. PABLO SUSANA ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PABLO SUSANA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________2nd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________8th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant Pablo Susana.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellant Pablo Susana _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 121917. March 12, 1997 ](336 Phil. 383; 93 OG No. 26, 3909 (June 30, 1997))
- [ G.R. No. L-32600. February 26, 1988 ](241 Phil. 966)
- A.M. No. P-04-1925 (formerly AM-OCA-IPI No. 00-809-P), December 16, 2004
- [ A.M. No. P-19-3966 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 18-4802-P]. February 17, 2021 ](897 Phil. 239)
- [ G.R. No. 126706. July 27, 1998 ](354 Phil. 1030)
- [ G.R. No. 224572. August 27, 2020 ](880 Phil. 63)
- [ G.R. No. 22967. February 27, 1925 ](G.R. No. 22967)
- [ A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1910 (FORMERLY A.M. OCA IPI NO. 03-1904-RTJ). April 15, 2005 ](496 Phil. 55)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.