[ G. R. No. 38683. June 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38683. June 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38683
[ G. R. No. 38683. June 16, 1934 ]
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, PETITIONER, VS. CANDIDO ABANDO ETAL., CLAIMANTS, MARIANO ESTACIO, CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT, JORGE AQUINO, CLAIMANT AND APPELLEE
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________La Union________, dated the __________4th__________ day of _________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________twenty-nine____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in this instance against the claimant-appellant Mariano Estacio.
It is further ordered that the __________the claimant and appellee_________ from the __________the claimant-appellant Mariano Estacio_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-35946. August 07, 1975 ](160 Phil. 817; 72 OG No. 572 (January, 1976))
- [ G.R. No. 241437. September 14, 2020 ](883 Phil. 517)
- [ G.R. No. 231991. January 27, 2020 ](869 Phil. 448)
- [ G.R. No. 12778. August 03, 1917 ](G.R. No. 12778)
- G.R. No. 180693, September 04, 2009
- G.R. No. 131750, November 16, 1998
- [ G.R. No. 139410. September 20, 2001 ](417 Phil. 836)
- G.R. No. 220002, August 02, 2017
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.