CTA Case No. 397 (Resolution)

F t� T.IC 0 T E PRIUPPl 1� CUuRT 0 TAX PPE I QUEZ CIT s� , OT r"'H n�_nn-l'l cc� J~J~,-,s , f � 1~r�.t,.rL;!lJ' � , LTD � t ?etitioner , - versus - CTA C SES ros. 397 COLLECTOR OF 1~TERNAT� RIWEt1JE, & 625 Re s,eonr' ant. X- - - - - - - - - � � - - - - X Tl ere being no ab~ectim, o th p. rt of co,l!1'"'cl fo r esponde�1t to the notion to\ ith- dr \J i t~s p t � ~on m; l,eviB�..; '"ade v eti tionor in oper <Pur t 011 July 29, 967, on the ground t t. t pet �� tione r has a l .r .<'d Y pa:i..d t~G revised a 'sessment , the s ame s :)Ul cl bs-, as i t is here- b.v , G t.~rL.ED. SO 0 DB' I:D. uezo C t y , A. .: .,ust l , l<)(il'?. 're~;.i.Ci � ..