CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 240240 1957-05-16
CTA Case No. 240 (Decision)
/ 1\l!:.t'UULll. 0 '1' I P ILlP.PINEI COURT J AX APPEALS lANiU .-~ -----.~ --- .. eal 00 - c:l y t � f � 1 )1 � 216
� . ... ( ). f 0 � � o� � f � � nly o t 217
�c - -, ;,;, v on f �nt1 "'Ultl � t �- � p 1 � t. �� " nt n r~ � t. nd r Gt on .. hb n ' t I l.n 1b10 � 0 I � �nd1c t ho 1 � 1 .... fle&l ~tlt � ua d ~ t�. ( at '� n ern t!o l 218
n r y, �� � y, 1 ny n� � � r l l y u ). t - � � " . 219
I' / �2 - 6- vr o 1 e of l�pp s y 0 c �� 0~ unt n n .,.� tt � �� f n� � n h1 �� 1 .� 5'1. # 221
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JERRY OCIER(CTA Case No. EB 491)
- SMI-ED PHILIPPINES TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6532)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MCKINSEY & CO. (PHILS)(CTA Case No. EB 2809)
- METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6765)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GRAND PLAZA HOTEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 786)
- REGUS SERVICE CENTRE, PHILIPPINES B.V. - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 3161)
- MIRANT (NAVOTAS II) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 754)
- AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6190)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.