[ G. R. No. 38781. July 12, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38781. July 12, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38781
[ G. R. No. 38781. July 12, 1934 ]
IGNACIO MARIANO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. MARCELO PADILLA ET., DEFENDANTS, MARCELO PADILLA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instances against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiffs-appellees__________ recover from _________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. NO. CA-05-19-P. August 31, 2006 ](532 Phil. 29)
- [ G.R. No. 123346. March 31, 2009 ](601 Phil. 571)
- [ A.M. No. 07-6-10-SC. July 23, 2008 ](581 Phil. 272)
- G.R. No. 112035, January 16, 1998
- [ G.R. No. 209714. June 21, 2016 ](787 Phil. 713)
- A.M. NO. P-08-2519 (FORMERLY A.M. OCA IPI NO. 05-2155-P), November 19, 2008
- [ G.R. No. L-11976. August 29, 1961 ]
- [ G.R. No. 96271. June 26, 1992 ](285 Phil. 994)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.