CTA Case No. O-69 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff, -versus- CTA Grim. Case No. 0-069 For: Violation of Section 255 in relation to Sections 253 (d) and 256, Tax Code of 1997 as amended by RA 8424 EDUARDO TUASON , Accused . Members : CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson ; UY, and ENRIQUEZ, & Promulgated : DEC 1 3200y p-n. X------------------------------------------------------ \ \ ? ------ --X y /=I~ RESOLUTION Section 7 of Republic Act No. 9282, which took effect on April 23, 2004,� amending Republic Act No. 1125 [the law creating the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA)], provides: Section 7. Section 7 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7. Jurisdiction . - The CTA shall exercise: (a) XXX (b) Jurisdiction over cases involving criminal offenses as herein provided : (1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs : Provided, however, That offenses or
CTA Criminal Case No. 0-069 Resolution Page 2 of 2 � felonies mentioned in this paragraph where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than One million pesos (P1 ,000,000.00) or where there is no specified amount claimed shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate. x x x " Pursuant to the aforequoted provision , the CTA has exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or the Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is P1 ,000,000 .00 or more. Where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than P1 ,000 ,000 .00 or where there is no specified amount claimed , the same shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate . A perusal of the Information filed on November 27, 2007 in the above-captioned case, as well as the Assessment Notice dated January 18, 2002, attached thereto , shows that the principal amount of taxes claimed is less than P1 ,000,000.00 or P694,564.84 to be exact. Pursuant to the aforecited provision , the CTA has no jurisdiction over the charge, jurisdiction being vested with the regular Courts. This Court, therefore, is left with no recourse , but to dismiss this case . WHEREFORE, premises considered the case-in-caption is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction , without prejudice to filing the same in the proper forum . SO ORDERED. Ca3U~ANI~ TO CQ. CA.ScTAcNErD-A,~:ffiQ(" . ~E~ ~ticUeY Associate Justice O~RIQUEZ Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.