CTA Case No. 785 (Resolution)
IU'!tPUBLIC OP THE. PfJlLIPPIN COURT OF TAX APP THE LIVERPOOL & LONDON C.I.A. & GLOBE I �su CE PANY , LIVtiTED r epresented by CASE t-JO. 78 5 / HSE & COviPANY, Ii Cq as General gents , Petitioner, - versus - COM!v1ISSIONER OF INTEdNAL REVENUE , Respondent . X� ~~ ~ ~ � ~ - � � � � � � � X RE S 0 L UT I 0 N Acting upon the "Joint Motion to Dismiss " filed by the parties on July 19. 1961, and for the reason stated therein , as prayed for , let the !'Petition for Reviewn and the c ount~r c laim of respondent be , as they are hereby , dismissed , without pronounc ement as to costs . ..y SO ORDERED . Manila , August 18, 1961. ~- ANO ~ABLE Presiding Judge RCftl AN M. UMALI 1\ssociate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2556 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2556)
- PHILIP MORRIS PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CONSOLIDATED WITH CTA CASE NO. 9695)(CTA Case No. 9655)
- DEDON MANUFACTURING, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1970)
- CTA Case No. 3699 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3699)
- BRIGHTPOINT PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6693)
- CTA Case No. 4519 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4519)
- MANULIFE DATA SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8878)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AGRINURTURE, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1054)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.