Civil Procedure
Civil Procedure A satisfied Microsoft Office User Normal JOJO 3 10 2002-01-10T09:03:00Z 2002-01-11T02:24:00Z 1 276 1575 sc 13 3 1934 9.2720 120
I. The Different Special Civil Actions
1. Interpleader
1. Requisites
(1) The plaintiff claims no interest in the subject matter or his claim is not disputed;
(2) There must at least be two (2) or more conflicting claimants;
(3) The parties to be interpleaded must make effective claims; and
(4) The subject matter must be one and the same.
2. Decisional Rules
Interpleader was found to be a proper action in an action of a lessee who does not know to whom to pay rentals due to conflicting claims on the property; 390 and in an action by a bank where the purchaser of a cashier's check claims it was lost and another has presented it for payment. 391 It was however found to be improper in an action where defendants have conflicting claims against the plaintiff; 392 and an action where one of the defendants had earlier sued the plaintiff and secured a judgment against him which has already become final. The action is barred by laches or unreasonable delay. 393
3. Procedural Peculiarities
3.1 Upon the filing of the complaint, the court shall issue an order requiring the conflicting claimants to interplead with one another. 394
3.2 The court may direct in the same order mentioned in the preceding paragraph that the subject matter of the suit be paid or delivered to the court. 395
3.3 The summons shall be accompanied by copies of the complaint and order mentioned in No. 1.
3.4 The defendants may file a motion to dismiss on the ground of the impropriety of the interpleader action or on other appropriate grounds specified in Rule 16.
3.5 The defendants shall serve a copy of the answer not only to the plaintiff but also to their co-defendants who may file their reply thereto.
3.6 The effect of a failure to plead within the prescribed period is that, upon motion, the defendant will be declared in default and thereafter renders judgment barring him from any claim in respect to the subject matter.
390 Pagkalinawan v. Rodas , 80 Phil. 281 [1948].
391 Mesina v. Intermediate Appellate Court , No. L-70145, November 13, 1986, 145 SCRA 497.
392 Beltran v. People's Homesite and Housing Corporation , No. L-25138, August 28, 1969, 29 SCRA 145.
393 Wack Wack Golf and Country Club, Inc. v. Won , No. L-23851, March 26, 1976, 70 SCRA 165.
394 Rules of Court, Rule 62, Sec. 2.
395 Ibid.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.