CTA Case No. 287 (Decision)
t-1 Ll I IC OF' THF PHJLlPz l!.J t)l H l' (, F I' \X APP~U. \.1 \N ll..A ' .� � ft'IUS � � . A. � 287 x- � � - - - - - - - - - -� t :r ls oft *l�loo w l.la _le f 'I tax ali.Jila~y eatlonl . . . � etlti er ��1� at pu l!c a11Ctlon f c~taln real ~ �� reaponcient, appeal dl�l� y pezolod � llZ. ut 1 f ,n \AIU�t d t.Obe 27, 1 � ... it f-. a or cenl1clRatlon ana (1) � f 27, f ln �~.... � zoep ea.n etten � of petltl (2) :1 ht o n90n nt l6,860.a a rea- CJ." � 611 61
7 -- I 11 � pl�ad!n a � oot aDtN<IIZ' tax of 16, ~.31 � � e~> &t. lac� thAI l�� flc! y inc ax foz 1949, � wUl �� tba fielency inc � a& P%"opeJ:� ��lua n of 1ntuest. th�t �� nee of 21, 4,. , 8 3. 4~ tly HSPCI.a<Mtnt � Ul*'Cy tax of 16, 60. 1 a t� 11 ........ t fb'st. it �� tax return f petltlene. 1t 1t .tdentlf.t.O � elq)ellaea fo adll � etc. � rh aJIOUtlt. � laall tit cleuln el of Pttlt!an�~r ���a.ry ta ........~ aald ac (1949 � etltl~ tts t at ��ld � t. �1n tt. t a C\llt1vat1 of ( is) ~o- �� ... .. ty �t oan e1,. .--..c....... r o. bay.� ( hU.lt .) ectlon (a) (1) f tM tloullat.....U oue Code allon tM .. .IIUG 11 t � ... f.QC.u.n:eci In tM c�� of far~.-r � tr � u bus . �� � lt � 1ch ..... .Q..taU .. .....rate t an not decluctlble t y 11QCl. K � � 325. p~ov da�c 75 f � ~latl � . � 2, 61 2 If
7 .- 613 (,f~
� 287 -�- � ...PH t �� o the natta oth 0 pet1t My l of ( :a.JDJYd"\y.. l� � � as to a~~~~Mmt spent oz ,~. .1tarlal � the . .I)UJlt't � t it t lr� . .Nft\ � ,__.. y fe cl..rl a t ��~ o place t a ',I'III'I!Dad~tlve state. � t. t re on, 1� ~.-raal - t ' .. fl8ib't. f.,...... '111..... � 2. - napect f any lld S 0 fR pe t ttezt~llleft�ia � t� ....-. . the val � � ate. lt ef exp f.tun y fu �� act c tHe � t .- to failed ly �lth t t� 1t � t hat t cla lNll � /)
287 .- l of � 3.31 npn � �l~ �� ,...,_..Mfttatlon e.....-a. COUMel fo:r ,.tltloftu has - -�- wl h the t ef 31,1 .17 - c :waaclaae4 as �of CIJCO. JM� "� of 1, 121.. ( �� 1.) he in� c �� � .te aot 1ti taa � �� � JlclaSM � te.rta ......... ., petttieMJ:' �1 e .tlMll.... W Dt -at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! ... , . . . . tl tl (a) (1) of Oie. hethR 011 _. �c��loft _. ce�loft�J t .,.._ pe.rso ~ lat1M ef MC per- �on ec ,.,.... wltb petit! �pent in � oc���tens iiMI \JIR or not t e.tn.ss of tltton � dlzectly ~~tly In oria' o quallff f� � it at M cle&~"ly .....,., ola.s.M to haft -... �pent for nsw� tatl at �nJaary �w... � th� etltlOAU' aU U .�. .MICe y evl -..uctiltlllty 615
7 (i � �� � 1� � ' d ;tn the a � :lt �� 39 � (2 ) � 105 2, c f 11 y At o.r ty of t f the nault ely c it � 616
� 287 - 7- � n& 0 �l e �� UGh c t1 y 11 t t of ta tt � t on. y t. .) 1 to "t: ll nt eh v all as a 617
I - � 1 - � c on c p ly h rul �1 Co � r- v. llee r o In �1 f1 - ht � ld r yt on t of 1 c 1n u t aent� �� � t t tel t �c f� 61 ~II
1 - .. t� f � �� c e llect def c ency - It 1 upon e crt d. t c: 1 � c th e r � - l - e1 If ta. r � � d 1 lt � r t sly �c 619 tto
7 - � l wi t ol etl. n f lC X � t~ c. 3 o, �~ �' � nt 1 t l vy � r 1 y ta ral t puru 0 u tp l t on - 1a � t str nt y �r ... � � -. e t � l .) �� � 1 ( ), 0 in 1 t0 ( � 1n � 2, � 1c � � t� � :::~7; 11 'C or � 7. ) f � � � !l 1 - Ju � � t 1 n � 620
� 287 � - 11� � In X&' :u::-n ft t� ll.. l 3. f � 0 lKt t I.e t� 1 l� tit fer the ye al �~� �InC� the ' ax � , 19~3, c llect clal �tion. wlt t� ., tw- yeu peri �1 � � notf � 6 21 6og
� 287 - 12 - ����� ~ �� t � lat � ..... aa uper- a.o.G by t one lssued ll tc n � c t� lt.aa eel ( uy ept. �� 1 � Int. ev., "t COUI"t t� collect th l*'tttcz' � � � �� ,...ollector I t. ev., �� v. CoUecto f t . � v. ollector U J 1. 19 7J IJSl)llft t.r �~�tlen of Int. �~�� ~-. I� c&ea!�l � ., zoe- � plu� tbe c~a- ln �~�� ate of dell� nc � ts alns pe ltlonft. 622
More in CTA Decisions
- PROGRESSIVE GRAINS MILLING CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 9847)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8166)
- CTA Case No. 6374 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6374)
- STEFANINI PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10595)
- CTA Case No. 3637 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3637)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MANILA NORTH TOLLWAYS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1157)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE. LTD., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1917)
- CTA Case No. 387 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 387)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.