cta_decision CTA Case No. 419419 1959-10-28

CTA Case No. 419 (Decision)

EPlJ LlL OF TIIF Pi!lLIPPIN lllRI'Ol 1 XAPPEAJt.;; \4 AN II.II - ... v s . t . A. "':S' ~ . l t. z - - - - - - - ~- - � ~- \"";" ,l c ~. th tit one e!n _. In� ,;r� PO"t (.;Of: � rei ...... yt 1 10 v ' \.fi� ' t "J � p. l Uil .. c.) Q r n l't venue cl iy~n"" �t t �' � 7.�' 5 :t e h () e d nd quir d !t 'to P y n re. t ! oun~ f d�ff r nt oc .... i.t;JH .ur t - . yo 1 "'6 $ au 10 ty 0 ct 1 1 o; ... 1 od c ;'.> c nt 0 .;; .c . pt f th. y i::)HS � �l f ct n � l:' 1 y, of le �ac - 1 � ct. � (pp. - � 't t t! n �� the tal of tle c s � .. rc 1 1...1 -y, t0 � ei ' Int r�r- r -1e � t1C c or t! n c 0 purpo . � cl( u of 1 o � In� c ti n, l� � ' 1- 7 , T re ) f t 337 ,~~

, I � L.~......___.-~-.-.u9.J9 -8---------=--------3-~-1----

� .... �- I � ' I � �� I ), � � 1 �l � � � � � � � 339

...... - . ' �r� -- 1. �.� c.r ' � :r. pond nt, p.re 1 � � nd tt ..,um t :It h~ roo nt o.f !$12 l'h~ ll �spect;t' dat \1' o"'" he ,joun u ct al,t �y ')aid, a~ � P' eaJriu if 1-~ ...'56 9� 1-~6 l., lC-- :J�""� ..""' (\ . .".'......... tho _, \i .:.. �!il ty f .~ ... .c t.r "r 1:.. (~ � 't .f.C 1 !t g . . 'f "9$:.)) Q' nt ..-�cr �t ~~ :t-ei'un Q to l tX 340 l

. .. � .p tt 1 r � el f � .. ..1. (� 1 F""".1 .c te ; rc on t l 7, 1 In ft to . ..., l l f .. v nu � � t t to t t x p ov� \ il u .o 1 �1 . & and d ni' cf cl f pt l i� 0 .. y 0 c d in ~PP "' 1 on .' . tr 11 tit- II C� 1 ' �pr t d in ec � t1 l � , I r 0. f" bj t to tt PP .,.dX on itS r o~s :tO� ct . ot G" n h .... � r!nt f�c t. , I. v y +... 1 to � f . e. A of c .- ~ d of h L an p �r th it 1 ~ t. , n ' 1 � H �� , 3 41 - - - --- -� - �- -

I t� � - s c � � $ � t ct r �r � )~3 � .. 342

~u. 1 ... f'i � :t; �~ tt n "� th t !.t 5.S c ( of f.C he .- y- t 1� uf ' c "'., 1,. lt � ' tp r l nn �H f. .... f') � n n �t � 1 f t 1 � t. 0 �.r t s �� !uc.; 'f~. tiJ t 'ti 1 l0 ) P ~s �1 � h. co oi t h'tl Itl �n J ... e� >0 f j pre 1 " th - 1 t. �t t.h � . t� ti eCJe� -. ' t C� \i t.t . .1 n 1 0 �:.v .� u 0 r1 1� 343

1 � � tl yl . � � � 1 ct on h r t.ton l 0 el s- i�y 1 .. �) '.)J 4- {1'

� 41 Pt t t � 9� it f $ n -s ail � 1C:h b aak s l 1 ay e .ng � tn th ,, in b s1n 1: tw c 1� h �- 1 act vtt s \ h a�d .0 stn ' � ~u � cb f. i~ J nc a f 1 1 le an p f.if 1 1 SSi 0� ni an 1 t p� e tau t � d in a diet t . f tr. a .:; iV1 y Ci , t l �rVG$ n .t nt l cted activity ts not t a o s para 1 y or d ly .� � � al a.;-d C!4 191;.. rd �v' cum 1 ~ � v � t . :tc. p 1 1 h � tc pal1 y of -'� A o \ n la '� c - . . � ( v � � � � 1��� p 11 A .- .) 1 d_ 1 fa t t at u, ~~ t~ en t � ng n t �� 345

- � � t 1 � � , (_ A. � � .) 346

- 1 t - getting ... t of - ... X X 347

� - 348

�1 - 13 - .tff.J � � 1f {$ f In ~ pt COIIJI'lllt�l",C1a1 ""'......U'..... ( t. co t � 1� ,. � l � 349

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.