CTA Case No. 941 (Decision)
PUELIC OFTHE PHILIPIN COURT OF TAX MAnILA APPEAL
PROJECTS,ING.. THE SCUTEAN INOUSTRIAL Petitioner,
a verous - CAE O.941 C.T.A.
REVEUE THE COHMIOSICNER CF INTENAL Re apondent. Waew0,1962
DECISION
Petitioner Scuthero Znduetrial Projects. Inc.
seeks to zecover fron respondent Coanisioner 3n
alleged over-payoent of advance caloe tax cn in-
portations etfected oy it.
Fotitiooer is engaged Sn tho manufacture of
gaivantzed Lron sheetn, n new and neceouary industry
under the prcvisiong of Nepublic Acts Nos. 35 and
9ol. It taported raw materials. consisting of anti-
mony ingoto, steel strapped load ingotm. cold zeiled
block coeto. aanonium chlorice and Lranding ink
whtch arrivod at the Port of Cebu tn Nioveouer and
Deceaner i9 9. and on which it oia only lc of the
customs duty in occordance with the dininiching or-
emption pcowisien of Section l of anpublic Act No
9
Subsequently. petitioner aloo paid ice of the
odvanco ooloo ton on the imported raw aaterials.
cutod, aaong othar thiogs. on the full custoas
duty. instoad of on the anount actually paxd by It.
460
C.T.. CAaS HO. 941 DECISICN
2
Cn tha theory thet the advance aoles tax ohould
be computed, aong othere. on the lc t the ovntons
duty whtch it actually naid, petitionor recueated
renpondent fer ti xefud ot the tot oi ancunt ct 5.128.44 ov-paid advance ales tax.The -
quest fer refund having beon deniod, the instant op
ponl wan inot ituted. However, in the asmcrandum sube
aitted ia support ot its appeai, petitioner seexs to
recovor cnly the uount of 646.99, tho correctneso
which amount is aet diaputod by zespondont in case of a
doeision adverse to him. Consecuently, take it that
this anpeal 1 iimttod oniy to the rocovery of F646.99.
Tho only question ratsed for our consideration
is the interpretataon of ehe phrase eustoas duty
found n Sectsoa.18(o) et the Tax Code. The perti
nent roviuions or this law reads
SEC. 183. X X
when the artcloc areimported. the per- centege taxes ontablished in sectlona ens pert ot origin tt there is any, including plun x x xi and tventy-iive Ber cantu #ive. and ono hundrad ighcy-six of thi Code shall bc paxd in advance by the im- porter, in accordance with gogulatlons prosulgated by the secretary of Finance and pricrito the relaaso or such articles fron custots Cuatody, aased on the inpczt torrect y th Philippine Consul at zhe custose duty. and all eimilar charges Oection ono hundred aight y-ix. x a hundred eighty-tour. one hundred e ighty invoieo value theroot, curtttiod to as freight..postago. insurance, ccaaiusion, t C (b) Salaatax n lonoted articles of articles wnumerated in
461
CACASE NO DECIGIO
-3-
It is suggested on behalf cf the respondent
thet the custons cuty adverted to above ohould pe intezpreted es ierring to tie Icc euutcas cuty
on the Imported articles, whether wholly or par-
tially paid by the importer. In othar words, St is
argued that for the purpose of cemputing the a-
vancs aalec tax, the full custons cuty should be
included in the total landed cost ot the articles
plue mark-up, negardless of the amount ot custons
duty due and actually patd.
The suggestion is without merit. Tho advance
eales tax is based on the Import invoice value of
the imported arttcle, including oxpenaes at the eine
it was rsceived by the iaperter. plus mark-up. In the detemination of this tax, landed costs" has
beea interpreted as Bynonymoun with the phrase totel
value. whtch mnans the import invoice valua of the
articie. including freight, poctage. insurance,com- mission, custcms duty. and all ainilar chargeo The
landed cost plus mark-up xepreeents theoreeically
the selliog price of the imported arttcle (Mayon Motor.
Ine. vs. Acting Conmiasiooer of Internal Hevenue. G, a.
N0.L-15CO0Narch 29.196l. sinee he el1ing price
of the Srported article is determined by its landed coot cr Inport invotce value, Sncluding expenses at the tiae it ws received by the importer. plusnark-up, what is nct related to the artiele no an actual expense cannot be doterntnat ive or ite aelling price. Ag a
4 6 2
DECISI CAT.A CASE RO
Coroliary. ft cannot bn o banis of the advance oaloo
tax. And, it. os in the caar ot bar, the importor
in antitled so o custons duty axemption of yox und
an concequence thereoi actuelly pays oniy ic ot
the full custcas cuty. the iatter pereentage of duty
should be coneidaraa in the computaczon of the cd-
vanco oalon tax.
In tine, m rule and go ncid that m phaoee
cuotonn cuty found in Saction 1B3f of the Ta 1M Code ohould ie intarpnutol to nean the anount of
cuctoms duty legally due and paid by the isporter
earca.the espondsnt Comseioner of In
tefnal asvenue is hereby ordered te reiund to peti-
:A tioner Scuthern Industrial Prejects, lxo. the sum ot 646.99.o 06t.
SO CROENED
Nantia, Moveaoar 2u, i9el.
Prsiding -Judge ZFMNCY
wg coneur:
Aosociata udge
D OA
ACMAI M. UALI Aseociate Judgu
463
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.