jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 40993. August 06, 1934 ] 1934-08-06

[ G. R. No. 40993. August 06, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 40993. August 06, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 40993

[ G. R. No. 40993. August 06, 1934 ]

CIRILO HAUTEA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. JESUSA BARRIOSO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Iloilo_________, dated the _________31st__________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.

It is further ordered that __________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________recover from __________xx__________xx__________xx__________the sum of P__xx__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.