[ G. R. No. 38981. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38981. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38981
[ G. R. No. 38981. June 06, 1934 ]
SATURNINA ARGILLO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. LUCILA SOSA AND SEBASTIAN GABRIEL, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision, after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________28th__________ day of _________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs of both instances against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the appelles _________ from the __________the appellant _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 187229. February 22, 2012 ](682 Phil. 608)
- G.R. No. 149121, April 20, 2010
- [ G. R. No. L-16096. October 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. No. 171201. June 18, 2010 ](635 Phil. 249)
- [ G.R. No. 12362. August 29, 1917 ](G.R. No. 12362)
- [ G.R. NO. 172315. August 28, 2007 ](558 Phil. 284)
- [ G.R. No. 246868. February 15, 2022 ](919 Phil. 991)
- [ G.R. No. 1332. July 31, 1903 ](G.R. No. 1332)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.