[ G. R. No. 39189. May 12, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39189. May 12, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39189
[ G. R. No. 39189. May 12, 1934 ]
MAXIMA LUGSANAY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. HILDEGARDA DE TOYOKA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Misamis Oriental________, dated the __________15th__________ day of __________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 54242. November 25, 1983 ](211 Phil. 101)
- [ G.R. No. 102342. July 03, 1992 ](286 Phil. 375)
- [ G.R. No. 64415. December 10, 1991 ](281 Phil. 777)
- [ G.R. No. L-1377. May 12, 1948 ]
- I.P.I. No. 16-244-CA-J, September 06, 2016
- [ G.R. No. L-7494. November 29, 1955 ]
- G.R. NO. 152115, January 26, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 111173. September 04, 1996 ](330 Phil. 106)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.