CTA Case No. 231 (Decision)
.I � � 2. 11. . . etel ������������ � , � fk that. S..t �� .~ � 61,. � c . .,t. \ t ' ~~ let tto 11 ' t 21 '!'
� �� � .... � � !t � Yal ~y ..... �~ � � lt l � ,, 1\ � 1 ax I 1. � 11 u ay J. j � ,., ., t.e c.Uec tU. � ......... t1.. "' l4tt 1 - t�t 1-- t, � ~~Itt. - .... IN lft f.na 1 �ttvlty � t ...., lyl. 19 � . ' lS.lt.atS. - coll � t,a ' � yet � J'l~ I e. T w aelltct. 1ft- � aft. ....... .. tbe f�\lvtt.y � 1� �well- 22
t � all � � .. � �� �oll thls ����� .1 � t. "Y�' , ~...-t. to In ... ,._.~ , �~ t ca � .-.vl4ed t 1 ... 1�� I�� v. llect � 23
.- �� � r. A. � 1 � - � � ,., 1.:11.) ,.s...., ...:~. --~Ia N't1M41..11.aa � I tf._,., ,.....,t.. ( ,,. l 1 ~ �tlOft 21
- �l .. - � u .... u �.U.�, c tt ' -.IM f� cell tt aU � � t: 14, 1 � au f. 1 1 ... 1, to � 11 � f 1'. . ,.... el 25 .:/!
�2 _ .,_ .~-- 26
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.