CTA Case No. 3778 (Resolution)
~i'U6LIC OF �ht. ,.1-ttUt>~�:~�r-. ..;OUItT 0 F T .�, :-;, c\ r�;�f.AU -- . QlJ.t.'ZON (..! or"'! PU LlC L s c PO TlON, e 1 .loner. - C.T.A. CAS NO. 377 0 X- - -- .. - ..... -- � � R apond~tn X \) L U 1 ctinq on th ti n fil by co 1 for peti- ion r n Jun 1o. 1 7 for he wi r w 0 th ition for r view on th ground th t th ur au of Intern 1 v n lre dy pro ed th c1 int or t X lv rein. nd th re b ing no obj i no h r a. nd n : h Cour r o1v � pr y d for, to gr n i ion. Let h 1 ion f r r vi w con id r d with- dr wn nd thi c clo nd in � u zon ~ity, M tro y a, 1987. c . ~ UI Jd
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.