CTA Case No. 2284 (Resolution)
� � .ll � P 1: II#l~ �t -- �"'v * ~--84 J4 ~ql1/ " � � r ... Iv. o� L -- .. - X - ... ....�.s...0. .. n � x ... �- .'.. 0 L U :t 0 an hi e l~d -Or r � :> n A1"Jril 23 975, c c.r ...t�t.s. n.r ' f ).f' 0.3tpo nt on th � t ;~ti�ionar u tnot be .fO<ll It w s th...n �or h ...n i.n. ~ 1975; . t on id lny p t i ... ~ t1 r ' f~ 0t () c 1 crrect '-"' l i nt 1 t ~$ n '"e- ... , u. t 7? en 1 rilr.r n 15', ._; t1t . r ' s -. uns l su..M tt j .r... �:ri t 0 r�y ng � t h b allow �, with Ul . oanse1 l 7 5 ? :� .!
2 1 .ri c. t c. 0c l .. t fo 1ack h �OU in1 a t ... I i t0 0 ity, r 29 1975.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.