CTA Case No. 358 (Decision)
/ yt/ El,UBLIC 0 THE PHILIPPIN CO ~ 0!4 TAX P~ .. � � .... � � l 0 621
� � 622
- � 623
� ..
625
� :.n- t 626
... � � � � 627
� - { ' � X 1 - � � 628
- � � � 629
- � � 630
� - a 631
� - . .. � .. � 632
- ) � 633 ..
- - - � they � 634
-- � � -A � � 635
- � ]\ �...r �- � 0 G36
� � - � ... ' � � � � ,. � � concurs and te opinion. 63 7
. ��� � � X- .. .... ___ _ -�X I cone :r i t t!'t at tio ct Ci Y� H v .r , 0 0 .th hie t C ty r 2 c y o .r nd .. tit o r h of ll, 1. 1p ty ~� rl ~.t u oxt fo per"ot f .CL 1 2 to 19~6 , 'n lu v � T tion in r �r to the r fun 11, 51. wn e ot l fo e h o and th of l0 ty. ) ol ui n t li y of culin � cy e C ty d. cl n or x 1 rt t / anc �s 1 0 1 t on - to r b- rua 15, entl , t t. our utho:rity t fu of � m unt. Th incl si f t e c�ty u t;f Ou on part t n 1.h ."' c u t; f nt t j c o h ii c u �on id of i i as c - r p n nt d ot nf r v en th Cou ju....i di cti 63 8
� �� -- � 639
- � �� � �� � � � t7� t �� � 640
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.