cta_resolution CTA Case No. 61056105 2000-10-04

TEMIC RF-TECHNOLOGIES (PHILS.), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Kepumu:.0 u~f th&e Tr'lo"lhili"pp10.11es -..,. "I "I ,-,nnDrr 0- F rr" x "1 s-, '-"" '-" '-' ...'- ..&. APDll � ..&. ..C'1.L .I. ~.L"":.. L.J Quez.on City TE~"1IC RF-TECHNOLOGIES �,t~>H~T~T~~.J~.) ' Y1~N. C., Petitioner, -versus- C.T.A. CASE NO. 6105 COlVIlVIISSIONER OF Promuiga ted: I lI\. ., T TfV'_.~ R l\I ".'T' A T J D1'-VI'.\JT'Vil'.\J.iT-, T\.T) fV'J, OCT 04 2000 I Respondent, )( - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )( RESOLUTION Confirming the order given in open court on September 29, 2000, Petitioner's "lVIotion to Withdraw Petition" is GRJ\NTED; on the ground that the amount of clahu tor retimd has already been granted. Let, therefore, the Petition for Review be considered '\'1ITHDRA.'\VN and this case be deemed dosed and tenninaied. SO OP..DERED. Presiding .Judge * __t\Mo~ ~YRt\ Associate iti;e

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.