CTA Case No. 270 (Decision)

r:t / I A � J'IUI � x- � � - - � � - � - � � � �a I � Thll 11 fr lsi o ea� ssln nt llectol' of 1 0 1,1 .11 tltion t nalty, er f t � t al rnl re. . tl�� e1n it � the ~��e f r - c:l 1 11 1n a ee ttl 1atl o e -1� � That petit! er as �furniture ealer� pure a �� fr 1 al furnlt � anufac:turers various 1Dda o f rn t e. � fflce ta lea, inlng ta 1 386

�2 - 2- dr� &or , .nt,...~.,..f'\l\�� d t � llt�� wlth- 1��� �� t v ~ l l , nt �ncV al.n r ������������������ 387 I

- 3- :r not e d ft � a le f 1 ct t x pre- c c t c 1n (} t reo � 0 nc at r � ch �� r � � � t y n rr cr d () ft X tf 1 - 1 1 In rn 1 ; 1 ( x) 0 t � ve � � ' - 38

. '- - - ax 1 �

.. - t ly, th et - inv n1 h 1x1n 0 1r or n 0 1 lly nuf ctur u nitur y nd � 11 � d - nh c n th r �l 1 X r1 r f r nd nd t t r n v t v.c nt t ..t fu_rn nv n t mirror 1 y r. 1 t J;t y � d not h v t 'C th c 1 t ly n n r lch 11 th p 1 c in n r 1. -n re r f th op n o ht t t n acturer �, ti t r .. - ~ tax pl t n 1 () ft .tea pr "P r y p .ys C 1 OI lt r � X X - tl. 1 ty of y t rt 1 uf ct r d r part lly n f ct c �o :r tiC it t1 �Y t f X X x.�. . tal 1� f y c- a that ere a sta � el ., 39 0

- � 2 - !: 1 c l c n n t b nt rp t d ut at nY p1 r i v. ' pt eo, Pn � ). 0 �t nd/or n � X d- t' '� .) 39 l

""1- .) 1n1 of t � ll� t t .. r � t s �1th- po � of y � tltl rf.n ufa tured f t�. c d/ t w:e. tha e � � � to � ld t 1� uu nt � loy all ly factur � �� c � � � r� c t �t � 1� - 1c ch leal t h n f ct ru�s ax to ectt 1aa (a) o ~f � ely not f t 1� cla f fu ture alera. 392

� -- ~ �t � fh 1 � t f. urer au � j to 16 1n I"ela �- I 't 1 eli te l- y , 1 .. .1" e �e 1- yv� .' �""� � 7,. -� 11 � � uly - � � 0� n- 3!)3

� -~ - th 0 .11. with co t at �