CTA Case No. 3437 (Resolution)
ltEPURLIC OP TH� PHtUPPIN!I CuURl' OF TAX .... P?E.ALS QUEZON CJ"rY SA ''Y( l ( ' lliPPl '($ ) T�A IN �:,~ .. .. � , J 7 C <UtA T 10 , p tt 1 ft 1' t r . r. � l i( r ~ J �! . �� F H n , l H rl l . - ft( (IW[, -- -~ ---------~ l � ( ,, -1 I! 1 'j t i'OfHiie 1 f\'1 .�1a rut Ut" . r ' t .ion r'-:J g(.HJO cl t PJ ar tt tf t �' d lt.t fl lu .. '1 t 1(,105 .,.. ~~� \ fl "f' ,. "" 1I' � f" of, h !ild ] ll '1 k IJ t f'~'< .. flt" 0 Jf i f fat' f1 .1 tt> n ~v f ( l1) ..n� t. c nt: in�.� lnce t~ . . . '',, 1 ~ ~ .. ' 1r: )r "'� < .f� (,HI nt �� t) ,.. --u �t> t l r 1 r.t f, � ,,. - t.h �. il 'v ~" Hl ' r- r. d nf '. rt c r p ti- J ,.. r i ��� e � rr � f'1 ' . !"l't: t 2 0 , JC. � � � -1.1 � b r v, � ~ rt\ 18
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.