jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 39326. June 09, 1934 ] 1934-06-09

[ G. R. No. 39326. June 09, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 39326. June 09, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 39326

[ G. R. No. 39326. June 09, 1934 ]

THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. MARCELO ABIS ET AL., CLAIMANTS, EMILIO AGUINALDO ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLEES, PEDRO VICTA ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Cavite__________, dated the__________1st______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the Director of Lands__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.