cta_decision CTA Case No. 17281728 1969-07-22

CTA Case No. 1728 (Decision)

- .. ~EPU'BblC O'P T1r& PBH.JPPINF..ll COURT OF 'FAX APPE.A.L8 4iWEZON CITY co. 1 l � 17 1921 . - - - - - ~~~~ � -~ ~

2 t o � is t 1 c 1 h1 a n , e th po t: or nil l' 00 1dn 1 1 port d. r 0g ) 1ght ( ) of 11 ' � {) 1 4 t '1 r . ;, e t $U 0 1t1 1- bat t 1 , . r n t C.O db tb or b . .nr � t :r l Yt ord r ot 0. 11 t , th. y r 1 nd ub eq t l d aubj '" ot f'orfeitur odin fo.r io a.- t1on of c io 2530( ) in r n1 t - -.5 h T f d C to v el ro 10 tto ot .... c 1 25'21 of ft. r u � in th Coll cto rnd r s!on , 1 2 196 a pri.l 1961+, 0r t r ar 0 1 q nd 1 p tin of 10, 0 � I 1! ct Cus- t l n p l 0 h fv" r, in scpor t , r1 d in- � �17 n 1 21. -f 183

l 1s , 1. fJ th ~ .r con i.st1n t 57 bP ' '0 .at � , bl1e ;. ctio in \J 0 cust n.e~ 1 . he � c 1 d1 y f t r a n i 0 1o 5 .1, t r era f c qu u d r �� ct ton 253 t( ) o.f .. .t r i . d Cu t Co , in t . t o t - ction 100:; or th 5 m Co � t t t ovtton of w ieh s t!on L 4

� try t-O 11 r.pt t t fac t ' h rticl t1on w r c rri d on l)o th "S/8 1th it .J.na 11 0 !~elud~ ,. s !""' nif�s 1 11 t 1y .1 f ro ;;.- ISS

.... ... . 1 �� ~� ~ (') u ' of th r 1cl 0 1) I ' �tit "1 ., r th I � tal lt :t p l" .� I l" th fb th' 11 (2) th mant� tw rtt nrl o. r a t k b t th w n t llow y th l r to. �' ( j) t i ss t �j ti h t t � ~/v l) v lv d tn e e ' �U l" .od th r \'I no cles.r 1ntentio to lill h 0 in 0 ,. nt th r, O'V()f of it � 1 vful r ev<' v � upport or t 'p tio.~. h,j fly r 1:1 c un nt 1!'!/ d t� timon 1 vS~ no ~r e: r ing t in!.str t:lve �rcH:. dings befor . t au o:f C ust~ " � of th ... n !\f t of t r oi q on bo. �d t t: to th f�3 lt and th 't'i b . ailw lo� �tn t r r. e ... c (t~ � l te h 0 ..~I � ' r v. l o own by �� � 1 ch e r ry n c r o qt s ion. � Th doeum .nts , 186

6 ud nt i s 1 -n h �.... J (1} � � c r.:tf d f eop t 1t e1 d tl 0. tr wn r 1i L Q, r 1y h ' i (2) ' w1 ' h1 0 th �S l I 0 :L ti 1 {) r f rl hat th d( t c~ 0 t r. �:ft t1f1 1 0 0 h1 hd 11 t; or 1 c ,n" trh t nd_ ni w~ not f'il d ~ !3ur 0 -C � er h 1t i �� <i, was nt ;! rr ne1 ' 1963 ( � 1 -1 7 � tl r :.~ 0 ~ l r on r l).'O t, ir t t' f am t ifPS . t- .0 hI "j 1 bo t 1 on e �t 187

�I tiO' ... C CAS'a - .. ; � 1728 ~ 1921 7 26, 1 . � n t _.tn h e th 1 v~ ve ; b s 18 , tb , r ll �4c1y -ra t.r t 1 fll 0 t v to t t .s. th - onAr n t he � /.. � DRA.fl?P rri e at ila n .. -pt nb r :20� �96; wt tb. o of i ~t\t ( ) cr tee or eh q ~ pa .r c � t 1 .er� .h t A!d ea� r9 ,. ,.~, 1 t n., eo - , cr - n1! st t tt etten 1 CO~ t .rovi for in 1 1 . enttld 1 is tlv Or � 1 �it. c der t:�> t , r:tr c to 1 �- .1' :pl i:teat " eargo. () X: tl� t 0 41 . tu e. en 1o. or &Y XC p ion in ion 2521 od i\tt 1n 0 � f r ls ro r r ro 1J1"' ng n.1 e s, 0 1 tton 53"' b 188

to t c ton f�et �� co ot 1 10 ta � nf c ti n, � cb 0 0 s, co rar 0 he ptr1 as tb 1 r l tl ge of t for me.1 pr i ion � bus, e Co � t 1 i l. .3 ;.,. ~~2). � or u. ' � "� n 1 l89

� ~ 'ith re � d n . 10 , . 1 po y r c d t, ttti f1 ld $-8 to b. Vf' con ".... t ' oir u t n t ti� i 1t 1 in tlmt 1'l 0 it houl� 1 p:o . only 1 r1ou viol tons. ln 190

� 10 1 t nt t "t 11 0 cl t .1 w 0 t0 1 - i.o n ol 11 .c r � 5. c 1 1 0 5�1 0 d 11 0 0 0c �� v; 11 t c �� 1 � 192 0 1 s �r~ � i � ti lo � s � 1 1, J 1 "' , 1 � l

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.