CTA Case No. 1582 (Resolution)
1 , r, - c. .. . o. 1:; 2 I L y~~ �~ ' _. ______� L .I t1 1n 1 t1 r ru �1 1 � cr 1 u 11 t1- nt t r t on i r 1 b r c. ). on r 1 9, lu l 0 3 .2 ( � l , r c n o he 102
� � 15 a ... 2 - G 'i n f111 ~ t p er i 1te nc1 (Ann tl ,. ' ' 1t1o � .... 1 c J o. ; � 2, PP� 43� pet1ti r�s c c.). for ti of th. 1 w rra.nt ot in t p. ti- ' 1~0 r (a 1c t � a.., CTA c . ). 1 1 tte br y 193, p t1 ion a nt h (; is r n le r1 n r u . t 1tb r l n c ~1 tion of s � t ( ~.xb . ,3, � rec . ) . n Mar ll, 19 ), p 1- 1 :r reit r 1 u t. .cell tion f1 with- I" tbe pr 1 XJt r;.... 0 ion � ' X � p � � ;Jl , t:J. c. ). In l i r o nt l'fl enu intor~ d p t.ition r th t it reque t for reeon ld r t.1 n ovid t t p ti.t1 rv l xec e.r f l it 1o { � 17, ' � 1 1o p � ct e ' 19"3, p ti- tn ac 1 bin� w1 nd. r 1te at 1ta .requ t .. or 1th r al and cane 1~ ion ha ( r . 18, l~ ition, P� ,., 1 C A r c . ) . tt r re or.. er~t n1 t1on r' e ,.. ' :; .rt or u ti io ~, pp. 11- ; . 2'7 <~nn .xh. PP � 5 57, c. rec . ). P&i le ter w t e bee r b p t~t1o r on nu ry ' --~ 1 � lt, io t 1 � ' C:.t r c . ) . pe i i ne a ain re ~ e n, ent' c siot.. ( nnex '1 103
'. ow 10 ... CAC ' � 15' 2 , ... 3 - t1t1 n, PP � 14- 16, c l" . ) . J? 11 t1�0ti he aa1 'If u t , r u th ;t r 21 t t 1 at Ci lin QJ'l.i t 0 5t 1 ;, ' ex - tr nl 0 1 be ' l' j t 1 1tu t c ll cti ( r l, ' i n, p. 5'- 6 , c . . 1 or r i 1le n re l , 19 ;; (p. l , CT . r ) Th ly is e r sl th r or nat 1 io e wit n 3- el"1 pre cr.1 in e � ion 1 R p �1 e Act o. 112 � n nt t app al we f'1 ut 'h r..t 1ie actu l 0 0!4- 1 ll .. 7, 19 ' 11 ,. ,J:"OU;: r r ec rq .tin l �;tvi.ng te i 11 er r pot h fo t tb.e p 1 s uat l t 9 ~. hie 1 g 0 hv en e y itlon. r � Jan r 26, 19 :It f~l� p icd for eal 1 to be c r ~ted la t _r d te . n n t p it Ott eonte tha � t utory appe 1 h s b 1 hi:n t. 1 � h rea b tit. n i u 01.' 10 4.
.. � N ... -, ........ o. 1:; 2 ot 1 � con e t1 n tn t the l �t r t J nu 1s or a rs d � l t �r r, thru r 1� 1t1on r 1 ; 19 5, . t u in r tbe Pr se � or 1 teJ>r"upt a by t 11 eti o t r �u th r r o- 1 n n � � ua y tt, 19 5� l tel' J n 1 1 , 19 5t in re p tt.er pr vlou r r r con ic r- a a t 1 ou ( e e - u 1!' ' � � o. 13.\lOl, � ~\(! l , l96t.~J � - 11. ' u. � 11;)6, � � � ll. , v. � � v. lt 1962�; . t son & Legar .a tt � v. Com. ot 1 t . 1., {t � � lyj the ~1o t ap l toul coun � d. tro ' pet1ti ner on J n ar r tn lt ha ~ br "" t t1- ti 01" r v:1 til on l . of1 11, 1965, 1, fl (l ) y � t tor -ur h 1: reco 1. r ion til ebruar ~. l 65t 1 n h ve h 1 t r in or o-d 'I p rivd 1t 1 t.~.ot e � nee new ' un not � iu ro~. r co 1 erati n; o an h>lic rch s p 1 05
� - - , .I 0 � 11. � � � o. l '8 J � � ��� ' 1( 2 1 al., . 2) . � � � - 17 91 , 0 t � 1 hu l I r r 1 1' 0 c � � � 1' t 1, � ~:f� -! ' ;c.-,- �.-8� I. - - .". """ � (L J h--.-' ,. 106
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.