CTA Case No. 838 (Resolution)
REFU:CLIC. OF TTffi P:_ILI HJES C OUR~ 7 T.t.~.< LJ?l E.l..J..JS L � 1-..:'IJ...Ji rTo TI:�.r.:sr:r: :-..IRLI"T""'s , rrc ., ,. , ' c ' r�To 838 v . '..~..'. . ..1.1. . S'" �- .;..:.., .. � ?c:titioner , - versus - co��~rrSSIO 3R 0 ~ IHTERL'AL .~. espondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - X RES 0 LUTI 0 Y This is iY"l connection v.Tith a ~~ ~~otion to DiSl.:J.iss ," filed y petitioner o~ Octo er 19 , 1962 , pray in~ for the dismissal of this case on the groun... t_lat the re- vised incoE!.e tax c;_ssessr:ents for 1951-1- , 1j)), 1956 , 1957 and 1958 issued against it were a1rec.,dy paid as evi anced y photostatic copies of the i�lco�Je tax receipts ~~exed to the motion . In his uritten manifestation, respondent stc.ted that he i -rterpose no o j action tl1ereto . \-I!ii>ll::FGRJ , lat this case e, as i t is h e r y dis>-:issea, .vi thout pronouncement as to costs . SO RDR.'i.ZD. :~anilo.., Dec em er 4 , 19(2 . ~~ l:>r-csidirg Judge ~ mu .L T l� � m r!~Lr ._ ssocia te Judee
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.