cta_decision CTA Case No. 25762576 1977-08-31

CTA Case No. 2576 (Decision)

IG ., . . �� � tit vr I X- ... X 'i J is l 17 c !:'i � � . - 97 ( Atlin !.� ~io ot. .. �11 c ili - n / or ' i ini. :iol 1 " Ll "; Th f Ctf' � lt tl ;) . t .t t n , 0 , ny t .t

- - 2- t -oce n sh i hi op e , mo g oth(r;s, t l � On 0 ril , l th r� v d t t "I r0 yin n 'isch g1n . he t �V nty �i (76) 0 \ or .ti n un e ill l. o .. 1 � ( � 1, ro l~ight o� "aid erch n- 0 1 in , 21 >s . in i t'~-e usto.� t iti ;;>, . it �)s ound Q_.:;; ' J. ~h ... h .. r f \r 1, 7 , 0 .:.7 , 4 .lb � v r 1 cd � 2 & � Cuat r b rc . ) - r g, to n- ci g. , J. 73 , i an i e fin o~ fiv th ( s, ''o . oo) c If n /or r !0 .{ . , .... 2523 f t.i ith tl Cl.S n, r 11 h cto � o � �' 1 1in c::i r cc,rd , nd' th mly i 0 1. t 0 t hv ., /o i in r in '"

:. t.;.; ! - � 51 1 ble r inir: r tive ne f , o . oo f. r iol� 1 n O' tion 2523 '~f th T iff no custom itio , nt �n th t ncith....r t th ti 0 ct on 2:.> 3 o u. .. , �lt.h h �he- � is th i ncy, h .. .,..,.. c - n~ t m sc r , , t.he v "'S ,J h 0 0 n e � t bli,~h r ~ .. '"'t"t.ic l.�rs co c.rnin �1 f hP. n y t >;!hip and a to 0 ow .~ _r , .... co 1 on y b ncy 0 th . ��1 ' caus e. s �ig t n ~h ec In th-. s or.: Custom~ , t."'!r 30, 1976; o . 2 561 Ja u ry 1 , .l 77 ; D ~ca o hi- cic. , no . v � r t m, C

-- ' � 2.: 76 - 1 .... ,' ~-e a . 2 5 , l....; , 1 77 -..;o. � n ,� � n ....: �sto 2741 , f)( 1~ $'\. �. s involv bruce y 3, n h ? ..�, t in r: ~im tho j. th. ' ~ u~ t r, t ' o ~ 0 �s c n , uncl cc� i or 25~3 ot t n 0 ri i .n i ht t t f. he , ' i () OW' .r C o n .... ,.. i tb- t- ht n e th h.c cou d b Ja n .) i n:. Ort11. .... -. GiOI 0 'L'f # in i c n J. .. ion i '. nt r i. h i~ it in ... con- f ' \.. ...... "~ l '� .,._'h ::... ,~ iu t.'l )� 1 .... c . 'B ., '� . .6 5 , l:>r �, l 7 , t i -.;U l y I' l 1, .c,;urt I

-� 7 - - 0 r ry � �� l �7� r l� , 0 1.0 � r , t: v - t c � t 0 � l n n h � � i g in h

... t - 5?6 p c:;i , l t. h �' .� a r i " r: ,. th in r �o ~t o \hich t i .c .1~ ,. 1 - . 4 . (l i } l , 7 s.u 7. 87. !.nc ~ un t:. l .tw i :. n fi. r �- h.. t r icla i nc _Jd t: ? , t - n ( ' �ve th ~ �<./or .e s 7 . Ot' 7 ,. 67 c., � c � u ~-m 74J , � : , l 77 . ) t.h .. c u tl at �h c n a h 0 not t i l l n 1 _ n �.:>r ro- ni t t B c s� �. :0 0 , Jr. t .. t. i t l1 v� .lvi t.: . 1 ty l!! �O!':JC on ch. ' m s n-c, �na f, i -j , � , cc i " d i-. v IL It ion ' L a ~ her b ..... .he � us oro " ino , o. oo for viol tion

.' .... "... of (~c~io.n ' ~ t d C tom ' 0 ., i h c t~ . s :31 - l 7 7 ~ Q- Jw �l>. Ci �

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.