CTA Case No. 282 (Decision)
ft~PLHLIC OF TI fTI' II LI PPI ,., COUB.T Ul APJ.>�Al !-. A' LA � - \~ n r��. � �� � 22 - 'f~' - -- - - - - - ~ - .. - - -x l � c 1- y 1 � � 11 h e h) ... ... t � y �e n ( ~hl 1 B ) re lr� y 1 stall y � y, .. 267, at 377
- �2 -2- 11 �� � 71� ����������������� ���� ( ) 1- 2, .. a al � dlf 37 8
- �2 ... � �nd th n"t th t . t �t � n �r t .s t 1 f ll tt d ( l , ~ 7. 78) h d t h . a i d t :r. en C: or:tp\lt d �t th llcg d corr t 1 na d eo t , ft d uct �n th val f t ut nd an t ~nne ic. ld b t X d, th rat f � Thi for r fund ni � c r �P n nt , rc f c:r .. qu s .. t.:.on ... d, p titi n r 1 t hin t 1 r nt y �:: � pro lie ct o. 112 f.l t . p t If p t tio 1 r' f or t b u in , ~ nt ntl n r g rd t l �:.1nt ...... h i � t n t, in h Aly "' r x, th t l t t tin 1 he ui c l ud . tl 1 tl e ah � D" V n d T ~p.o y .t 0 th t - ~l tut rn l R V3nue CtJ $ ht - �e .. e 0 y� (�) �� 18 ( ) X lI
uE~I..J10N - .. _ c.r. �. ~ASE ~o. 282 -4- ' AJto~ooile chassis and oodies, the selling price of which exceeds 1 ..J ,C'C"' :Jut dnes 10t exceed ~ ,C'C"0 -------------------- 50;~< A~tn1ooile chassis and bodies , u, e s e 11 ing pr i c e o1 ~/1 i.c h does not exceed l 5 ' 000 ------------ JO~ ' 3oth sections 184 (?) ano 18' {0) provide that: - 1' t t th s d r io tp t n C� co ut nd (2 v n if � r ch p rt cc 1 ?' ch 1 quip nc, t th t v lu t io n c t� X p t1 ti n 1 of X t� in fir r ;,1 in t i hi c t c 0t c 1 t 1. oth j icil � r t! r ..ul ti nvol eo ft foun in th (�J�;i . ) ax 1 !o & (a t"on ~t of 1 1 ; ctlon 1 U.o . v. n f 1 21; ction � � � v nu ct f 192 1 t pt 0 380
EC f "l("l .. �22 � foll o t. �t . A. C i,) .. !) - n � ce &hv - .. 381
� � 282 of tne - 6- f� i f r th t nd, i s re 1 ci 1 rticl din rily l be u ��� l in ot th 1 r d1 nd nt n 1 �1 r ny 1 l t. l l . 0 th ca~. �ld in lt ti t. ve c y of � var tt� n- dt c r� (u r . . � vs. ' c Ue -c!g 1 c n n 1 ht r n h eiv t. 0 � au ile � ., it ably cl " ed t h � to th ent t1 n of the ~ar. 1v 382
� -- sol y r n<l. tt � cu- �f nt r ile ts � � e y vi yy � n c t 1c y � � 1 ' � c � yr ' 1 u 1. c or ry. ) t eli 1t ( � 1 t � IC - 3 83 0
� .. - tn f n. ( t h t y t 1 � y c � t 1 I f f. y 1 f .J ( ll � v) � ty 12. pr n 34
I, . �12 v- on t r dl c �t f 17 � J:t"SU nt to t n 18 of tt-. c rr ct t J t X � on tta. or atio f t e pet t on 7. , .. . � ount t tt .. t t1ort r a r d .. � 2, nc. r ! n f"\.:r n 1 E tr .. . � � �( xh! 1 A�; p ,. ,.., p t f.t or. for r ""'v w) � � t �ref re "' r~t �tl d t~ 4 t'l.: -:- ft:nG f 7 r� f J.'c nc ht � eicl a d t n th~t .:~ t l}' du � �r p n lo �� ~ y t r ..lJ(J t l)rl ... t (r cl t su f 1 , 7"". 0 nt . 1th ut r nc n � � t u- ~n. 57. 1la, � LI 3 85
More in CTA Decisions
- PAMPANGA I ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and REGIONAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH M. CATAPIA, in his capacity as the REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REGION No. 4, CITY OF SAN FERNANDO PAMPANGA OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10961)
- JEANE CATHERINE NAPOLES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1655)
- PHILIP MORRIS PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8692)
- TRANS-ASIA RENEWABLE ENERGY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9516)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ASIA UNITED INSURANCE, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1725)
- PPD PHARMACEUTICALS DEVELOPMENT PHILIPPINES CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10466)
- CHEVRON HOLDINGS INC. [formerly CALTEX (ASIA) LIMITED] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 837)
- MARUBENI PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1548)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.