[ G. R. No. 36407. May 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 36407. May 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 36407
[ G. R. No. 36407. May 07, 1934 ]
MAXIMO DOL-LOOG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. LAORPO TAGATAC, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Norte ________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. P-09-2644 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 08-2787-P). July 30, 2009 ](611 Phil. 646)
- G.R. No. 167217, February 04, 2008
- G.R. No. 199497, August 24, 2016
- [ G.R. No. 61259. April 26, 1983 ](206 Phil. 539)
- [ G.R. No. 193000. October 16, 2013 ](719 Phil. 573)
- [ G.R. NO. L-25595. February 15, 1974 ](154 Phil. 478)
- [ G.R. No. 207815. June 22, 2015 ](761 Phil. 496)
- [ G.R. No. L-44112. October 22, 1992 ](289 Phil. 495)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.