jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ] 1934-05-05

[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 37512

[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]

JULIAN ARROYO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. FELIPE DIMABOGTI ET AL., DEFENDANTS, FELIPE DIMABOGTI, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT, VICTORINO ARROYO, ET AL., INTERVENORS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from _________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00___, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.