CTA Case No. 1929 (Decision)
REPl'HJ.IC OF TilE PHILI PP I.~ES C(!lJHT OF TAX APPEALS QUJiZON Cl1'Y �� �9 ... - - - . I ll c ,.cit ts t rtc c it t!"t 35 ,542.. r i o"' 50 ,.._ c, c � J� il ' ~9 1l ' it to cn � r t r ./1 ( ) )"'... t p- . n � . .l :'\ ,6' to 1 1': c- n J:� t j !:) ' co r � l z co., t -t st t~ #- t ., to 5 7 n 5. 3 ' ct1 247
D)'}ClSl �. � c c ~ ~o. 1929 2 nJ. 1n n n eor~ n~ . th. oy t � t nrl 1nh tane or 1t c it t' w.r~ � i 1 b p 1 tio r y ' 19~7 9A5 , cttv~ly � .,f~r p . nt cr "th . 1- t onal trans r t . . d . , P"l i tio r 1 ocounta t t e. 91 th� t .. h � th~ ... ro 1 Or' C pot- nt th r vts tr . r r t n .; fi tng th t .t (1) . ~ th p a .tn h t.h ryo th y ve y lOWJ (2) c rt ur .c 1V bl s ' h th r t ~n; (3) t jU! 1<: w,.. r llo � n ct� o r o 0 s�t. t� ; � � (4) e t 1 cl 248 . \
- �~vr., lor TC ~ . 1 29 3 t �- d c s t t.t:) � rn no s b. ta.n t t . 1 ~e� On prtl ,; , 1.967 , s on~ant man fro t1- t1o � : , ~ c toto of y Pac �a t t ,. pay ~. n t. of rot owa s .. . . . . ������� . .. .. .. t to 8 ................. r- c . 1?t o� th 1 tt 0 Pr11 2 , 19f..?, pt. t tton r ' b 1i ll - t1o .. 0 � w r1 � b halt o � p t1t1on t" w.o w s by .nt to eoll et t~ t ;; 249
� (2) i - / � t 250
. ""C l J � 92 5 1 p. t t ' l t 9 0 11 () y �/ t 0, ht il lb ... t1o � co () y t � ~ !:; , h y t- i l ... ) t 1tl P" 1 to ' 19~ � e t th ... 0 t. 1 t 0 io �� . 1 c � ... nt ' o .. c. � 11 p yi t c00 t t f. t ,. 251
s o~ ... C~"' � o 19 .{ t _1n� 1 w r r � .t ..� 1 t t �~ n1 PP c on, 1 r c1 0 t y ' t:t r 0 0. 8y ...... .... ... .... ...... ............ . c ' nt. t 1 P'ti 252
-. . ,.,cr I c '.lf �' 99 7 cont""o . 111 f!! 1 t th r 1 t , 29 ' t 0 .......... ' o, "8". 3 n l p t t 3 :.t-2 912. oo, eo - pt 0 ct �' 253
- u n "C;r) I "" C C1 !. 'tle. 1929 8 !tt ! 3 , t oc� nt y vi� nt ..tl �1n urt1 1" .. th� t , t e� r ~ of h ot ... 1 l . r d b TC1' o. n val � t-io 0 th t 0 p l '. tl' it. b h~ 19, 074. ,;;.; ........ '39716 1,5' 1. 1 TO'l.~ .� ��. �� "' � T t1t"1e : i.osu 1n 0..;~. th n li lot i-'0 tl � tt d y th wo "' t r v n� X1 . ~ . , - l to �14 , 1 cl ~ 1 ' p � r c. ) . l,7l+. oor.r r �~d oy ~ a.pp atsal r port or r" 1 to.te pra 1S � ( 1 h �� - 3, � 149-15 , T � ) On t ~ . �"liJ:' n , th . eo s � ,.� rt d � of l a t 1 ~; y th V:S: c Yr tf tea. of ! t tl "o� 39716 � rir~t1 � s " .. 254
.C � l ,:! T(� 9 .-~ .). 1 �.L 0 � �o b t. t .... '� 3 (; t ... t" neon ct- 1 � p p .o p ro t ... tf.\!, p � c 'h 0 Q 1. 255
'10 t tr ' n .co t .. tctoey (etlll .r' � ,m,. , 237 ( ) 7) ,.. 3 0 r T 1t m t .. t e b� o. 397. 1 �- .r �s xp t ( . \acp tt ' 8o 1, t. � ) �~ c t. t / 1, 9 1t 28' . ~ y th ... t r ,� o, or th 1 t I a. . to 735 209.02, 2d,C5C.l2 ,1,.. anr1 QOl -,et1 1 f ... Oll '01/ V 0 &: (& � �, 34 &: 3 , B � r e. ) T. . r ... t c ~' l c �� "' t 05'0.1 ~; , . t, t lonJ tJ 7. 7f 7 ~ r.tSt :tt r e lVobl s me nt1nJ to 0 '!.:' . t in t~ tn- 1 e -:1 n ' t 0 t� 256
~c ro .. c 929 ll pos � 1 s o!' 37, 07 � ? w - l ct ;t1 1 th l t t0 t (3) . t S COt!Cl to y io ct nj 0 1 .. +t ort. "" t.l t c1 l.., ceo ts t 0t n" t c ., 1- � .() t� t l 0 nr - , r G et o. ., t ti' e n t l t� t concl ' the 257
_:Cl~, IO ..., C l C ~ � No. 1,29 12 t1� ti t tl: � , x- t 0 0 ~1 lly i - bl s ru t7(, $65. � � t PP� 175� '! 3, CT r �e. ) 1 e by itt ~ ~ 2 � , , .,, Z-1 t bt x�n1n� ~~ r r c o'r c i4 0 1<1 nc to 1n w � ~it s th t tc tl n:� fo �... p:. b - �t 0 . !I - of' th ill 01' th t t. t- lb .. 0 ti .' � it - ti 2 .ooo. c � ...... ��������..�.�.�.�..�.�.�.~"�.�..�.�.�.�. lriliiiiiil{li!!i!I!C!iill=a= �� 258
- 13 0 fl ,o .o ' th~ ur Hl)( ) Oi t c ..., .� J. d r �1, .,)2?.43 t tat,, l 0r j bj tho au 'e :r nt in.... 1n.; n b c '� '3 P� o�... .� � t 'r.�'l no t ct 1" 11n 111- "lllrt, :: , thor...roro, c th t t '� r - y 9, 19 J, th. .y c cow. ot h a 1 a 1l.1t:J...."" l, 01,.327. 3 eh ort r 0 0 s:.1 <:l' t 1n t t1ng th~ atl'l 'tr�n l1'"b1l1t.ia<: r:!t r ... 1 o . . 1n �h ��9 2 bal nc ut ch o is i.ol:l lon 1s not suft1c:1 t to w 1'~ t , of th ' ) 0 th.~ t , 101, 32-7. � l hil t n t "� t . r~ eo t"! u eo 1th s te fin 0 t th . lo � �� "" r th nt 1 t � ~0 th - $ 1 tn� b by th 1 t. tly , t.axp: .. .r ' e ec unt .. 1 n4 1 259
7C ION - CT C o. 1929 14 liability hich o s o t appear in his balance she t ./ has no material b a ing on his income tax 11 bility. bov all th conclusion an sp cul.ation of the r - inv~stioatin xaminers , it has b en st blish by th pr~pon ranc of Vid nee at th~ trial of this cas that th lat y Pac was in bt in th total amount of P-1 ,101,327. 43 to th~ China Banking Corpora- tion, Philippin Bank of Co unications and Philippin ational Bank in th~ amounts of �555 ,169.49, P200 ,454. 48 and 11345,703 . 46, resp ctiv ly, at th t e of his ath on bruary 9, 19 3. {S e pp. 1 , 5 & 35, Bm r c. ) 50% Surchar� � h 50~ surcharg as fra p n lty impos d by S ction 102 of th National Inte rnal Revenue Co e is not applicabl . to t h is cas becaus "'PO nt ' s xaminers !'ailo to s tablish by Vid nee that the ec nt �s cuto an . adminis trator has fra . ed the 'ov rnment of its la~>~ful r. v n � On th contrary, r spon nt ' s thr e ( 3) aminers app ar to be car 1 ss and haphazar in th 1 inv s tigation of the d c ent ' s ..stat � s, oains t th fi ings of t r ven xamine this Court oun in th r co an in t~ Vi ence sub- . � mitt~ by petition. er a lo r net taxable estate of th lat y Pac ~nting to only 722t389. 80 co pute as follows: 260
I ... ..................,. ) I . thl" 1 tr ns - 1 n or t. ,-. c u �n . �h~ t .. n i nr to ctat ,?7o. �~ J. 'C () t dlt � ~ !J t. � 0 t or .. c1.1on r .sp~n t is� lo ~ t" - l r p l ~ -~ �S 0~ 35'lt9+ .-33 u .. ~ tr th;, ( t:IIQ CHltor <!'} t t to . i c ne 11 n o" inll ... t.o CO"' " :o c a i! ~ ct. '1thc t ir1no ..nc � t so ' C1 Dec 2, 1973- 261
More in CTA Decisions
- TOLEDO POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11272)
- CTA Case No. 2393 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2393)
- ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS PHILIPPINES, INC., v. THE UNDERSECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND CHAIRMAN OF THE ONE-STOP-SHOP INTERAGENCY TAX CREDIT AND DUTY DRAWBACK CENTER, THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, AND THE COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1327)
- CTA Case No. 237 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 237)
- JGC CORPORATION MANILA (ROHQ) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7983)
- CTA Case No. 2628 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2628)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8123)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ONG BENG GUI (operating under the name and Style ` MUCH PROSPERITY TRADING`)(CTA Case No. EB 1248)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.