CTA Case No. 312 (Decision)
... - - er 12 nt. fr� � X� � � ~ � - - � � � � � � � � �� n 415 1/.1
� 312 - 2- pt , r�� n � ag nt e xaai � � Cl tt and oth .r re or of , ak n t t 1n l th � u t1c le -�� n � 0 lc et th th excesa d y � ch c r etpt # � � 1 � ��� 4.16t an n h !) !I � y, � d y � or - !ca # � t It !n t ' t oll 6, 2 2 ����� ������� ����� cketa le 1, t �� ��������� � �to J n. :16, 19:> 416 'Ill
IO ... C.T. A. a � 312 - 3 .. 261 ,7 6 � 0 �������������� � � ��� � � �� �� .1 � � ( � the aatea._.an... t � inl petit! the la t c �t��� � t! n ,_,oJrt. tly. as � 1ed by hl son f f 11 �� d lartd 1n �f ul � pet;l 1 n f r w tht.G � t. y law. � � c petit er ll1s ev � lt n t tht �~ 1us1 Aft � resenta t f etl.- vu, an J � 18, f wle f he ulet of Cow:t. 1- 2 �t�t� � exe � 1� ne 11genc�. cc d n � 417
.. �1 � 4- it n thia C f June 29 , 1 57, ~t1� ton fil c hf.& l' t en earlng s 1 r 1 estt nn �f -~ pr� - 1 � the J: s f>f t r 1� nt ore 1n ft tat k d 1 h � al. r ur �� n ult. It s u �.. t e n a� 11 :.rd. p t c: ""1:"8 ., 1 e t nt t - c n t tut - nt d t ju cl 1 c nf rb trl\Lj'. h ly r c ; ( ) t. tlt. fr 1 ht) � ��� g n 111 of � not y at ( a t ) at � fJ:t r.-ceip a � c � � ill he.. re t ita 1 t - .t � c lu � " nt ... 41
... � 12 - 5- � � �� t. n nt o of orr ctn as o is n t o rt 419 ot
�6� y � i I. 1 t nt that era of uud s u � of � � � ~e le � � an freight t1oketa wbi h ���� a are hypo htt1 al ��� � 1 l uld h ve ~"�� fut d the 1ve c r~eotn��� f � ����� ent y .reeent 1n evi � � he t1Gkt\ kltts an cash � re � p. t � er in est1on, hie , � � � ln the f Win � c ntruy, � ta � �� ein � � ���! � the a t� of the a �� .7: alled t diapx-o t e r tn �� t e nt tltl � tth I' 8%' � ��� th d p ti 1o � arauea hat re e! ts issue or he e eaa a a � are t bill f ladin f the r��� that t ey o n t c ntal t e de cri \1 f the erche !ee, t a anti y, the val �� t � �� and e consi nee � hu:ef re, t he e h enta of the l � onae tly, � � aa1nta1 , they not subj t y tax. h11 re, e cann t lt! r�s pr os tl n. � 1 127 'lnanee � hich Inter~ vln t 1 Aut � �� I � v. ~ lle t o Inter al even , JYpra), r�� � �� f 11 s: ., .
�2 - 7- hil� :l - � or p it 1 t � v� J. ., � � fre ia or - � tr e t s jec t t the article 1ht .. . 4 21
� 12 - 8- lsau eli o � et1 te a gage, \lt rei ht. �� e1 eana th �� art lea of p�z� al �on� � 1 at la sta �� �� - 0 t val �� t1t1oner � t at al f ~ ll �� t. ���� � X X are � tlaket.s� t y ce f o e.r the vel e 1��� "�� �� n ��� � f r t � 1� .. :~ t122
- � 12 - In vlew of he a ission ta1ned 1n peti� t1one.r� d. t.�d June t 19,7, �� aka it that rasp ���u 0 utln the t x, eel h t 1�� ��� e � l � r a! r� that t � � 1 1�� atacl pon oect1on 121 of t n 1 1 n ~ � 26 da � ept g ld ulati n, as f �t ' has the f ce n �f t f l � nly cr ta r� f t h 11 ch pre ever, 1 Uli e pay d t nt c t 1� � � �v o nt f l se c n- XC d h ( � �� v� n er 1 t Up n c. t po- , y re f t a1tf. n t t 1oh � Heip 1 ere �� ~. alrea y aer � er s uld ve ln evi � i at b le � nd cash fart r etpts p part1cul r1 y the !ntta �� were t r ..et tt ere 1s& e f r � with values alow 1n each etance. v _n failed to d a � e � un� le to et with petitioner on the p o osi 1 n. � ver, as r ar s the r f eo c nly .,
1 � 12 - - 1 1 d etltu�a lc c ti� ed atly . ����� ~ultural, 1n the auv�t! n eC f.n t � 1�1 ut �� ra� 11 f nte:r: a � � 421
� 12 - 11 - nal IV t, � . A. �� � 2S � July~. 19~7.) � the ������ en ate u 24, 195 1� n � ' � is r r t IU 15, .16 Janu y 1, �� d entuy at tax f � lod fr epte tr 16, 19 � ith c t1t1 nu. � u u t 26, 1 57. n!l � P 11 .. 425
More in CTA Decisions
- NUEVA ECIJA I ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9563)
- THE CITY OF MAKATI AND NELIA A. BARLIS, IN HER CAPACITY AS INCUMBENT CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI CITY v. METRO PACIFIC INVESTMENTS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-143)
- DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. (Philippine Branch) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8796)
- CENTER FOR TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8742)
- CTA Case No. 4233 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4233)
- CTA Case No. 4959 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4959)
- CTA Case No. 6001 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6001)
- CTA Case No. 2132 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2132)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.