CTA Case No. 658 (Resolution)
11!1f.li'IT8LIC OP ~ 11'JYTLTP"P ,,.) .K] ;) I ~AJ, ~~ ~ i....,.,_ COLd 1.t:-c1 �.u�� LI L'-IC ., I- et it ione:r, - - v~.,;r~u.;> v.w ". .-.'� T �� 6~8 �~0. ....,0 Li.U t: .h..:..� w....> ..._._; ............:._ f 1 � .J:- !....:> f .\IL... L , itespo dent . X- - ~ - - - - - - -----X ..{ .c .,) 0 U f I u .�ctin on the �l~,otion To .l.JiSiniss � filed oy the petitioner on July ~. 1959 , to vJL i.e:: -::.e es - pon6ent did not inte pose an opposition , and it appearin~ that the former no lon~er desires to appeal the de c ision rendered by the latter on pril 1~ , 19~); ,....> Pr' v-.t:D Fv.1., let this c a s e oe dismis s ed without pr ejudice and wit out pronouncenent a s to cost s. / ..anila , July 21 , 1959 . 4~ re siu.i.I..J Jud e .
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.