[ G. R. No. 37492. May 05, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37492. May 05, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37492
[ G. R. No. 37492. May 05, 1934 ]
NECETAS REYES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. GUILLERMO VARGAS ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________11th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , reversed and it is ordered that the complaint be dismissed with costs in both instances against the plaintiffs-appellees.
It is further ordered that __________the defendants-appellants___________ recover from _________the plaintiffs-appellees_________ the sum of P__88.00___, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 3097. January 05, 1907 ](G.R. No. 3097)
- G.R. No. 112191, February 07, 1997
- A.M. No. P-94-1039, March 06, 1996
- G.R. No. 139412, April 02, 2003
- [ A.C. No. 203-CJ. May 29, 1975 ](159-A Phil. 479; 71 OG 7949 (November, 1975))
- [ G.R. No. 173339. November 24, 2010 ](650 Phil. 412; 88 OG No. 12, 1581 (March 23, 1992))
- [ G.R. No. 146296. October 15, 2007 ](562 Phil. 78)
- Adm. Case No. 6850 (Formerly CBD-03-1155), July 27, 2006
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.