[ G. R. No. 37581. May 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37581. May 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37581
[ G. R. No. 37581. May 28, 1934 ]
EMILIANA ALOVERA, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. NICASIO DE LA FUENTE ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________4th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Capiz________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed without any special pronouncement as to costs in this instance.
It is further ordered that __xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__ recover from __xx__________xx__________xx__ the sum of P___xx___, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-35910. July 21, 1978 ](173 Phil. 379; 75 OG No. 264 (January, 1979))
- [ G.R. No. L-29560. March 31, 1976 ](162 Phil. 299; 72 OG 5560 (May, 1976))
- G.R. No. 178895, January 10, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 43291. May 11, 1935 ](G.R. No. 43291)
- G.R. No. 185312, December 01, 2016
- G.R. No. 169565, January 21, 2009
- [ G.R. No. L-32432. September 11, 1970 ](146 Phil. 30)
- [ G.R. No. 146408. April 30, 2009 ](605 Phil. 327)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.