Opinion No. 16-14 Re: Foreign Participation in a Real Estate Brokerage Company

SEC Building, EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City Securities and Exchange Commission Republic of the Philippines Department of Finance

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

23 May 2016

Brokerage Company SEC-OGC Opinion No. 16-14 Foreign Participation in a Real Estate

Rockwell Center, Makati City PUYAT JACINTO & SANTOS Hidalgo corner Plaza Drive 10th Floor, 8 Rockwell

Attention: Mr. Joshua Gilbert F. Paraiso Ms. Jessica Kristine F. Hilado

Gentlemen:

your client, Ducasa Ventures, Inc. (Ducasa), a legal opinion regarding foreign participation in a real estate brokerage company. This is in response to your letter dated 11 December 2015, requesting, on behalf of

under Philippine laws and is engaged in the business of selling RE/MAX franchises. online continuing education programs and RE/MAX global network. Otherwise put, the in the sale of RE/MAX franchises. RE/MAX or Real Estate Maximum is a U.S.-based real estate franchise company. Ducasa is the master franchisee of RE/MAX in the Philippines. Through Ducasa, the franchisees of RE/MAX can tap the strength of the RE/MAX brand name, the RE/MAX training events, franchisees of RE/MAX engage in real estate services, although Ducasa itself is not engaged You stated that Ducasa, doing business as RE/MAX Philippines, was incorporated

in partnering with Filipinos and creating a Philippine corporation which would purchase an incorporator in a brokerage company where 60% of the shares are owned by Filipinos and foreigner is not allowed any participation in corporate real estate service, even as an 40% by foreign nationals. RE/MAX franchise. However, he and his counsel are concerned that under Philippine laws, a You added that one of Ducasa's potential franchisees is a foreigner who is interested

brokerage company where 60% of the shares are owned by Filipinos and 40% by foreign nationals. Hence, your query on whether a foreigner may be an incorporator in a real estate

2

estate brokerage company. In support of this argument, you presented the following bases, to wit: You argue that a foreigner may be allowed ownership in the registration of a real

which provides, thus: 1. Republic Act No. 9646' or the Real Estate Service Act of the Philippines (RESA).

"Section 32. Corporate Practice of the Real Estate Service. -

requirements. There shall at least be one (1) licensed real estate broker for every (a) No partnership or corporation shall engage in the business of real estate service the persons authorized to act for the partnership or corporation are all duly registered and licensed real estate brokers, appraisers or consultants, as the case may be. The partnership or corporation shall regularly submit a list of its real estate service practitioners to the Commission and to the SEC as part of its annual reportorial twenty (20) accredited salespersons." unless it is duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and

footnote, thus: 2. Tenth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List2 (FINL-10), which states, in a

-"Foreigners are allowed to practice the following professions provided their country allows Filipinos to be admitted to the practice of these professions: x x x real estate service (real estate consultant, real estate appraiser, real estate assessor, real estate broker and real estate salesperson) x x x

x x x real estate service (real estate consultant, real estate appraiser, real estate assessor, real estate broker and real estate salesperson) x x x allow corporate practice by Filipinos.

which declares, thus: 3. Republic Act No. 70423 or the Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (FIA), as amended

"SEC. 3. Definitions. - As used in this Act:

a.The term "Philippine national" shall mean a citizen of the Philippines; of a benefits, where the trustee is a Philippine national and at least sixty percent (60%) of domestic partnership or association wholly owned by citizens of the Philippines; or a corporation organized under the laws of the Philippines of which at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is owned and held by citizens of the Philippines; or a corporation organized abroad and registered as doing business in the Philippines under the Corporation Code of which one hundred percent Filipinos or a trustee of funds for pension or other employee retirement or separation the fund will accrue to the benefit of Philippine nationals: Provided, That where a Exchange Commission (SEC) registered enterprise, at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote of each of both corporations must be owned and held by citizens of the Philippines and at least sixty percent (60%) of the (100%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is wholly owned by corporation and its non-Filipino stockholders own stocks in a Securities and

the Philippines, and for other Purposes, 13 June 1991. Regulatory Board of Real Estate Service, Appropriating Funds therefor and for other purposes, June 29, 2009. 3 Republic Act No. 7042, An Act to Promote Foreign Investments, Prescribe the Procedures for Registering Enterprises Doing Business in 1 Republic Act No. 9646, An Act Regulating the Practice of real Estate Service in the Philippines, Creating for the Purpose a Professional ecutive Order No. 184, The Tenth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List, 29 May 2015.

3

the Philippines, in order that the corporation, shall be considered a "Philippine members of the Board of Directors of each of both corporations must be citizens of national.

applying the definition of a "Philippine national" in the FIA. Hence, your argument that a footnote in the FINL-10 includes a corporation which is 40% owned by foreign nationals, corporation engaged in real estate service, such as a brokerage company, can be 40% owned by foreign nationals. and that it does not require that a corporation engaged in the business of real estate service be estate service by Filipinos. Your interpretation of the word "Filipinos" in the afore-quoted 100% owned by Filipinos. You also noted that the FINL-10 allows corporate practice of real You stated that the RESA expressly allows corporate practice of real estate service

We believe otherwise.

has been set on the practice of profession in favor of Filipinos, i.e. as a general rule, the practice of all professions in the country is exclusively reserved to Filipino citizens. However, an exception is also stated in the said provision, i.e. when there is a law which professions in the Philippines shall be limited to Filipino citizens, save in cases provides otherwise. prescribed by law.4 It is clear from the afore-cited constitutional provision that a limitation Section 14, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution declares that "the practice of all

RESA. It provides for the regulation of the practice of real estate service, such as real estate consultant, real estate appraiser, real estate assessor, real estate broker, and real estate salesperson. As you correctly stated, it allows corporate practice; however, it is silent as to whether foreign participation is allowed in such corporate practice. The law enacted to regulate the practice of real estate service in the country is the

Constitution and specific laws, provides, in List A, that no foreign equity is allowed for the practice of professions, including real estate services, as such practice is limited to Filipino citizens, save in cases prescribed by law. This means that the practice of profession by corporations should be done only by 100% Filipino-owned corporations, as no foreign equity is allowed. The Ninth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL-9), pursuant to the

in the practice of interior design in the country, the Commission declared, thus: In a previous Opinion, which discusses whether foreign participation can be allowed

Constitution that could have provided an exception to the prohibition against foreign participation in the corporate practice of interior design. However, as stated earlier, the law is silent on the matter. Thus, consistent with the well-settled principle that the Constitution, as the fundamental law of the land, is deemed written in every statute, the general rule that the practice of all professions is exclusively reserved to Filipinos, thereby prohibiting any foreign equity in corporations to engage in such practice of professions, should be applied. "In the instant case, the PIDA of 2012 is the law referred to in the

4 The 1987 Constitution, Article XII, Section 14, second paragraph 6 SEC-OGC Opinion No. 16-04, addressed to Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan, dated 16 February 2016. 5 Executive Order No. 98, The Ninth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List, 29 October 2012

4

corporations, such as a real estate brokerage company, that will engage in the practice of real estate service. Based on the foregoing, we are of the view that no foreign participation is allowed in

regarding the practice of certain professions. While List A of FINL-9 expressly states that no services allow corporate practice by Filipinos. List A of FINL-10 indicates in a footnote, that (1) foreigners are allowed to practice several professions, including real estate services, subject to the reciprocity rule, and (2) real estate foreign equity is allowed in the practice of professions (save in cases provided for by law)! However, we acknowledge that there has been an amendment in the Negative List

In our Opinion cited above, the Commission stated, thus:

Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), as the agency tasked to endorse the footnote, that foreigners are allowed to practice several professions, including interior design, provided their country allows Filipinos to be admitted to the practice of the same professions. To note, this was not the case in the prior Negative Lists, which that a clarification be made with the NEDA. We likewise recommend that the PRC's comment be asked, considering that it is the lead agency which implements the PIDA Investment Negative List' (FINL-10) was recently issued wherein it is indicated, in a explicitly state that no foreign equity participation is allowed in all of the professions. including interior design, enumerated in the List A thereof, citing Section 14, Article XII of the Constitution in relation to the relevant professional laws. However, as to what the modification in the FINL-10 actually means [i.e. whether the National amendments to the FINL8 ... changed its previous position on the matter], we suggest of 2012. "As to your fifth query, please be informed that the Tenth Regular Foreign

and Development Authority (NEDA) and the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) be consulted regarding the amendment in the latest Negative List in relation to the relevant provision/s in the RESA. Hence, we would like to reiterate our recommendation that the National Economic

be used in the nature of a standing rule binding upon the courts, or upon the Commission in that the facts relied upon are different, this opinion shall be rendered null and void. disclosed in the query and relevant solely to the particular issues raised therein and shall not other cases of similar or dissimilar circumstances.' If upon investigation, it will be disclosed It shall be understood that the foregoing opinion is rendered based solely on the facts

MANUELL OGC Supervising Commissioner UBERTO B. GAITE

Executive Order No. 184, The Tenth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List, 29 May 2015. 8 Republic Act No. 7042, Sections 8 and i3. SEC Memorandum Circular No. 15, series of 2003