CTA Case No. 1531 (Decision)
IC 0. 1f � F'll'Ll 't' ~ )! \.1 I ' PEAUl '-tL ~.tu .. ' <. 11 Y I �. .531 ... v rsu - .. - - - on c:nt. ... .... ....... ,. "O -. cla i m f th 0 th t1 f ot - t! 1 l4 9~ 7 . pc;rt � n c n� c.:e � al t ac n ..nd i - u� .h: b n il� p ~ nr: s . i st .'..J., t y n � t�. � � t" � t on r c cC h .. n tor: 1 U. � � r ""h pc m �o4 ~ 1 9~7 , "nclu~ivc , t 1i ,h t �I ' 4IJ' 5
�l ..
- ) . ... ......... - - - """"..... 0: .. - .... - J. . 1 ..... - .... ........ l .o n. ... .... ... -... . - - - ......0....... -.... ... .4
1.) 1 .--_ . ... ... -- .. .. .... �-"" 72} - - - -. t"l p:r �� n �� � t . j~:..C; t;Q .a.tt. � } c not jtC X a , - � �r "t n 1. , � <: � r �r: p'1::0TI �;_, >). ~ th. r OT.C. tl '� i.on o � tn :e n � .~ct � i.onlolO'. .1.d "'ri v r '71 1<- t~: - . . � "'� 'l �f � ~. � � . i.,: t X y -l 7. ~n V( rwe 0 � 4 . 10 cv 6 .,, . '� :c "1 1 t �~ . J!lh(
... N J . 1531 r fu < .. ,IOU (r.. x ~ . 8 -1, oldc p. 96- � c. ) ctin~ on p it o �r ' s pro claim for refund r sp nd-n t or J 1y 14 � l 96r. 0 j. for ,] i rotc t d cl i for r - un i tt� , l , .o. tn crtdwn 0 ht. ip 1, t'�SPO -.-nt 1 c; b ucn ~~ (I ..h � f " ~ -1 , de r, � 1'" � I c . ) ny \1 ~ hdr . lng f 0 he 0 in l s t ul of ep n -. 25 s r-c �,a ~~ � .~com <:~nal t � G fo th yc; r ~n qu � no cordtnsly, .h only two (2) L �u s p!: "'Ent d fo do e.tf tnat i o y hi ourt � v zc ) e:h � 0 p � . i. tion 0 .itl d h r-funa f . l .'I ., ou t (') o. ~ 1 , 4 )c r 0 in ' . to th bc:~:'! iC wit toL n l r.;4t .lX ai f y(;.ar l9o5. 195 l1 l r17 ; �n () or !0 ic: ill li(J 1 to t on h b ic L ' c ' � L-> ' n �c ord nc l. th ctlo l{ 0 th # U.r! 4 9 l!"'-'
6 .. .c 1.1 o.v come 0 .h ~ f"rs u� n T.' cont .nd thQ i na l. b fo ~.thhnl in� tax ",', g� u d h 'p ~ .i s, !G . ub c.t ~ ly f so -Fixe utl if' t c r in Jl u � .n r rof .l �n an . c mr.-; . ha n ll neu nee (;0 oani. r c'"'n� i l tl . I~ r t tc l.tl� com...; h:l .... "'.0 r th 0~ ~ : �~ lr. '� c. Wt n ayi ,r t i n HX t �~..>< btr;if'!C s y .~ l . rsvl �n i ' or �~� on tho n Q �. cl.u i.. s '{ \, C' t i c~,. .",'" in ni s"g 5 ' r o. 0 ,.... ni ~- ~ c J ,,pQ:ili ~ =J:tG n t � -C r: ax , 1 in t , � obj cc _ o 3 . .. x . t ..J L' r u... oncc co ir .. li p' i.n � h uX i c t1
~� t � l .. J ;I . -- li r.O'.) on en � nt ins 'h t elc1.l 0 h c 'I h .n y t' JW c n cu1 c �~ . lJ In � J4, on ) nu o not 'I'l.O� _n.,u�. � i CG that w� r J.hc 1t OJ o in
11 - ' u 4 ion, r 0 c o Utlan � f"'r po G 0 h� � in '0 n� l t h< p <.i�l ms �Ion ri h� hol i n ny (,. d :.ha � pr c' ved oy n: ... nt orci c r � per �sc i n in ur: nc c .pa to �n <l'tC! c r . ax oso un or th -,, 4( ) (1 n � t is .n- s � pro� i f h s�mo h ul c . " . t hol I r n potJ .. ~�nc �.th � n :h cl<l, f nc. c on- . of 0 j ~c n � tn ~0 � h 1� c s �i 0 non- rc. � i (n fo i i <lX s . n >t Nl n, '-h. e t ilt t of ls ~>prcr.1i ms" . . .f. i not n c 0 n n- r fl �u r (.. cc ? t ny - � n� r ,;,) '!' t~,;; , d c � an .. i llt il<f"\ C<r � l -""'.t. l l� W- y c ic n � t.c ir
- t � 1 31� ... . .... dJ jcct t> � ~ tt . oJ lr ~ � x. " ov � �d l'O d I 0 ..d
�1, ... 10- rv h � ntho o. ~ � � �n~ li,an, 4l 1� � /
'l - 11 - nt .� � � 3 rl.' '1 n > t no v . � f , .. ~ i � 4 , H � 485
1 ... '? ... ' �
3 n o� 0 - � h u I: lc � d . �� e h- I ,, 1 U' ,.. ' ~ f :t n � hA 487
... 14 .. ov t .~nne by p y 0 .remi �:t.n9 aid t X I -n �h y_ c rn e nn 4 , J ion l In �r "' Rc cnuc �� ()(i l -~ cl. "�;a. 2, l J~c . jl &..-.. , - - . bid.' c. 1 . _;.' f It \ c bviot s t a nc � t1e z .) tn g ov.._rn.~~ (,nt .end~ l< - u p ;iod s , t .ere. is h�;;, c 0 t. f ht:: j_ lc..tJ:� ~ ' p '� nd < 1 i : �H. .o th gD 'Crnr .c 1; ..ta�~c � �t J i bl e ..... t .. +-~v c u.i. � , �or :r:� �.fu ~J n n 0 Vith costs against petitionero uc.z.on � 1 ty ~ ._, .... /. I l . .. �;~-- , / " ,. -: c:t,:~tc t ns
More in CTA Decisions
- MINDANAO II GEOTHERMAL PARTNERSHIP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7800)
- RITEGROUP INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10538)
- CE LUZON GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7558)
- CTA Case No. 5786 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5786)
- Univation Motor Philippines, Inc. (Formerly, Nissan Motor Philippines, Inc.,) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8637)
- KARINA INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9204)
- CTA Case No. 4108 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4108)
- PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8268)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.