cta_decision CTA Case No. 15311531 1977-08-30

CTA Case No. 1531 (Decision)

IC 0. 1f � F'll'Ll 't' ~ )! \.1 I ' PEAUl '-tL ~.tu .. ' <. 11 Y I �. .531 ... v rsu - .. - - - on c:nt. ... .... ....... ,. "O -. cla i m f th 0 th t1 f ot - t! 1 l4 9~ 7 . pc;rt � n c n� c.:e � al t ac n ..nd i - u� .h: b n il� p ~ nr: s . i st .'..J., t y n � t�. � � t" � t on r c cC h .. n tor: 1 U. � � r ""h pc m �o4 ~ 1 9~7 , "nclu~ivc , t 1i ,h t �I ' 4IJ' 5

�l ..

- ) . ... ......... - - - """"..... 0: .. - .... - J. . 1 ..... - .... ........ l .o n. ... .... ... -... . - - - ......0....... -.... ... .4

1.) 1 .--_ . ... ... -- .. .. .... �-"" 72} - - - -. t"l p:r �� n �� � t . j~:..C; t;Q .a.tt. � } c not jtC X a , - � �r "t n 1. , � <: � r �r: p'1::0TI �;_, >). ~ th. r OT.C. tl '� i.on o � tn :e n � .~ct � i.onlolO'. .1.d "'ri v r '71 1<- t~: - . . � "'� 'l �f � ~. � � . i.,: t X y -l 7. ~n V( rwe 0 � 4 . 10 cv 6 .,, . '� :c "1 1 t �~ . J!lh(

... N J . 1531 r fu < .. ,IOU (r.. x ~ . 8 -1, oldc p. 96- � c. ) ctin~ on p it o �r ' s pro claim for refund r sp nd-n t or J 1y 14 � l 96r. 0 j. for ,] i rotc t d cl i for r - un i tt� , l , .o. tn crtdwn 0 ht. ip 1, t'�SPO -.-nt 1 c; b ucn ~~ (I ..h � f " ~ -1 , de r, � 1'" � I c . ) ny \1 ~ hdr . lng f 0 he 0 in l s t ul of ep n -. 25 s r-c �,a ~~ � .~com <:~nal t � G fo th yc; r ~n qu � no cordtnsly, .h only two (2) L �u s p!: "'Ent d fo do e.tf tnat i o y hi ourt � v zc ) e:h � 0 p � . i. tion 0 .itl d h r-funa f . l .'I ., ou t (') o. ~ 1 , 4 )c r 0 in ' . to th bc:~:'! iC wit toL n l r.;4t .lX ai f y(;.ar l9o5. 195 l1 l r17 ; �n () or !0 ic: ill li(J 1 to t on h b ic L ' c ' � L-> ' n �c ord nc l. th ctlo l{ 0 th # U.r! 4 9 l!"'-'

6 .. .c 1.1 o.v come 0 .h ~ f"rs u� n T.' cont .nd thQ i na l. b fo ~.thhnl in� tax ",', g� u d h 'p ~ .i s, !G . ub c.t ~ ly f so -Fixe utl if' t c r in Jl u � .n r rof .l �n an . c mr.-; . ha n ll neu nee (;0 oani. r c'"'n� i l tl . I~ r t tc l.tl� com...; h:l .... "'.0 r th 0~ ~ : �~ lr. '� c. Wt n ayi ,r t i n HX t �~..>< btr;if'!C s y .~ l . rsvl �n i ' or �~� on tho n Q �. cl.u i.. s '{ \, C' t i c~,. .",'" in ni s"g 5 ' r o. 0 ,.... ni ~- ~ c J ,,pQ:ili ~ =J:tG n t � -C r: ax , 1 in t , � obj cc _ o 3 . .. x . t ..J L' r u... oncc co ir .. li p' i.n � h uX i c t1

~� t � l .. J ;I . -- li r.O'.) on en � nt ins 'h t elc1.l 0 h c 'I h .n y t' JW c n cu1 c �~ . lJ In � J4, on ) nu o not 'I'l.O� _n.,u�. � i CG that w� r J.hc 1t OJ o in

11 - ' u 4 ion, r 0 c o Utlan � f"'r po G 0 h� � in '0 n� l t h< p <.i�l ms �Ion ri h� hol i n ny (,. d :.ha � pr c' ved oy n: ... nt orci c r � per �sc i n in ur: nc c .pa to �n <l'tC! c r . ax oso un or th -,, 4( ) (1 n � t is .n- s � pro� i f h s�mo h ul c . " . t hol I r n potJ .. ~�nc �.th � n :h cl<l, f nc. c on- . of 0 j ~c n � tn ~0 � h 1� c s �i 0 non- rc. � i (n fo i i <lX s . n >t Nl n, '-h. e t ilt t of ls ~>prcr.1i ms" . . .f. i not n c 0 n n- r fl �u r (.. cc ? t ny - � n� r ,;,) '!' t~,;; , d c � an .. i llt il<f"\ C<r � l -""'.t. l l� W- y c ic n � t.c ir

- t � 1 31� ... . .... dJ jcct t> � ~ tt . oJ lr ~ � x. " ov � �d l'O d I 0 ..d

�1, ... 10- rv h � ntho o. ~ � � �n~ li,an, 4l 1� � /

'l - 11 - nt .� � � 3 rl.' '1 n > t no v . � f , .. ~ i � 4 , H � 485

1 ... '? ... ' �

3 n o� 0 - � h u I: lc � d . �� e h- I ,, 1 U' ,.. ' ~ f :t n � hA 487

... 14 .. ov t .~nne by p y 0 .remi �:t.n9 aid t X I -n �h y_ c rn e nn 4 , J ion l In �r "' Rc cnuc �� ()(i l -~ cl. "�;a. 2, l J~c . jl &..-.. , - - . bid.' c. 1 . _;.' f It \ c bviot s t a nc � t1e z .) tn g ov.._rn.~~ (,nt .end~ l< - u p ;iod s , t .ere. is h�;;, c 0 t. f ht:: j_ lc..tJ:� ~ ' p '� nd < 1 i : �H. .o th gD 'Crnr .c 1; ..ta�~c � �t J i bl e ..... t .. +-~v c u.i. � , �or :r:� �.fu ~J n n 0 Vith costs against petitionero uc.z.on � 1 ty ~ ._, .... /. I l . .. �;~-- , / " ,. -: c:t,:~tc t ns

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.