CTA Case No. 139 (Decision)
l 'll I OP TIJR PlllLIPPINEI COl.JH1 01� 1 A.Pl_,&LS MANILA - r ' ( ti on r, ~~(f 6 ... ;.., . .. � � - � - ~ - - - - - - - - -x !i I 0 11 an ' � t -- � ... n rr ----~~----~-~-~~-~ ------.--- 1 ,' r c t ut t on r . �l � 222
�1 - Il u � � al (i p 'tio. r � of 0 h prof i- c� h co r ct- aeas o c ct � �� it ~ y s ry or c 1on . pr cr 5 0 r on n 0 � e ah 11 p rr t � �� � � i nl f ct � :1. ...,;,J �tO Xt r � c or � on Yn � d p tn nn , 1 1. 0 th' " i� 223
�1 �hall t0 � 2 2 -l
- � - .. It l �~ ' � ... t ' n � r ..ry 2 , l ---�����-- 1, pc 0 f r . fro l � () 0 et h c pp D � - p rt�e l ost � nly � � ( � 1d - ee er 8 , 1 � n " . 225
h of t1 � � Ac f 1, nt , ort J �1 l . 99 � � r ill not 1 �n h of th of cp � , 1n l ct o. � v p nt o r c 11 for 226
r h f. to t 7 � " . 227
� - .. a'! � n � � � .)' � � 229
..,
. . ....... � 139 -l ce 1 not 2. T � � c. ot 1 _......-........ r ) ti � n r t t 0 tl 0 ~r p rt. o 0 Ot. c r 1, ' rr nt nl t ort c p rt r 1, 1?47. t X Yr n vI r r 0 c c r .. n f nt t r, l � 0t r. (; 0 � "' c i 11 t en c r, 0 l upo , h p ren or 231
r � 59 - 11 - pr ent d tn to � at he n� uyin n el in p l jew lriea, pr nt to ~y h 1' �
- �l , .. 1,.. .... 1, 1 , ltl d t i n, 1 � 1r y 0 � ort ,, ............... � � � rp nh rr .. 233
� � .. l - 0 - 1, � s 10-11, � � � � ... � � ., 23 1
.. 1 � n c f) c r 2 � 1 1n n n~r i I t- t X t t, 1 1 c - X � 1nr dy t y - l t't 1- j c1 0 � �( o, -� � �� 1 tor nt. � � n. 1, � � .. � � 01 ... r � a, h .. "c l 1 ct on 1 e n y 235
- -~ - �c c pvl ' h 0 1�� or fr 1 n 0 o. X �� �� nt , 1n 0 tX y ov y 0 ny � � i h en y er 2 36
--- - .. �0 1 � n y c � 1: d of c ll c :t' - un [l r h "� 0 X 0 7 t ' � � 1 �- 237
11 � - � 1 !en o ....h y U.-0 I n fi 3'.1. . hi h c n r t ,. !. , ol- �t ' , r lV \ � .. 23~
- 1 ... y y nt r l �h 1 I � � 0 �� y u r X0 - 239
7 .. l � � - � �--�-~----------- 240
- 1 .. ... __.. _________ _ -----------~------------- � nt � .. u �� J-� - 241
- -- �1 -. flte t h c � ce I ) y .. 1� y ., 2 4 2 � rr s-
�1 - ?2 ... t 1 "' r 7a 9, i hi nd nt .. � 00 yr 1 1 ion r .. �� 2�l t ..h1 ppines, 1 . . 243
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. STEFANINI PHILIPPINES INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2864)
- JIDECO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 53)
- SMI-ED PHILIPPINES LANDHOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6649)
- 1MAPLE SALES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1662)
- CTA Case No. 3830 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3830)
- VILLARICA PAWNSHOP, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 293)
- CTA Case No. 3017 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3017)
- CBK POWER COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with EB 576)(CTA Case No. EB 574)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.