CTA Case No. 1312 (Decision)
,q �.�'t:i>l IC OF THt:: Pli!Lil 'INUJ CO UR 0 T X AP X'EA QUEZO.~ CITY � II 1 1 -- -- ... l' - 1 7 1 t !I 28 5
�1 t � , .... . 286
�11 11 io t ( ' t t - � - of 1 l1 287
� � c 5t 0 , � ' � � � ,, 2 8
o. 1 ., .J. u 0 1 1 1. , 1 � t '51� - � � 1 � ' u l . 1'7 ... 1 � i . ~ r .. 1 :r � t e� � t 1c ly: ) rr � :I 289
�� .; (1) ) (~) �� () . j � 11 - t ,, 29 0
� 7 ,, 291
t � - 1 1 !I 29 2
�1 - ( - � 293
- �) �11 1 ) c 1 � t 1 � i t1 a l ,, 29 4
1 11 � r J, 1 v ' f c � 1 � :� 29 5
�1 � ' 296
- � 1 � � � l ) - - II 297
- � ... �1 1 - � c. l � o e.r of 2 )t � II 298
- �1 1 � 1- t It 299
11 - - � 1 15 - ) 300
� 11 'l '� ' � , � 1 t I � l l' 301
�1 0 1 a � - 1 t 9 1 ' t7 7 � 1- 302
- 1 tax � ,1 - 1 I' 303
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.