CTA Case No. 1341 (Decision)
:\E'I"U!IT.IC 01" THE PHlLIPPlNEI COURT OF 'FAX A-PPE.AL8 QUEZON. CITY � -� .. --. - ' � .1 ' � , I .. 359
-- � ,s . .. � � �t 360
- � ln � - 1 t t96t, p t1 or ... � �t1 1o t 361
-- - ----- 1 13 1 r d1 p � 4 r- ?1+ :to1 n 7 � van a le 0 5-79 th r� 0t :r,. �OW - r, 10 a l (; to c. ) , t>, 1 e 1t . full ti Ok :t 1 r nt � � � ax t 19, { th r 1 t .r of p~tit dt.tt - r 31t 19 2, CL h r ! -. l d 1c1 ney ta s in-. , t 1nvolv h - fPO 19 1 5'6 C � 15".. ....16 ., e J ,. . r hr ' on -----~~--~~~ et �tion.r t1 n r lt' t l 362 \
{ � 18 _, ' t � t th! Co t to 111 ts u io .�. i 0 1 .. t h . t 1"' f of nd/ t l1 t'f " t d 1 61 , e 1>. em.. 19 1 � id wa n da 1l y 1 11:6 cut Orl y 21, 1~6 � A th �~ �nt 1 1.1 t1o. eli p t~ 1' t .ion r f e, PS w lm ' v on l �s t or... h-~ en (l - r ,, .. :L . �� d pr cri b7 ,, ,. ot io . 1� 1~5 I'.! th~ fore, hi i 1 n to �� ogo ~ C!B 'lt .. .� ?(1 l 0 ct 11 ":)." 1 ) et %'� 0 " ;Q on 1 r, ~ ' ))t'<:V_. s , n ,. 363
. "."'o. t34t ot r , th Jt is 1 t fb dt t C � i si,OnP".t of Int ... .. �� . � (""' 1sst � ! ~ o. � .. ' J u ry 2, 1 s , �sn. "' Coll.cto~ ot Ir!te.nal .... .) ot r wo . ror t ;fi tb1s Co t v in .... t1on 1t f 1)3:' 125', tir 11 t i to J-"U. eu 1 .) ! t nr t la to h"s c - tiOrtPt tl st1oo 11ty s ! it pr f 16, 1 nc� t e , .. 0 t r � ' q\le t' e<to .r- sat rt th . 3 64
1 a 1 1 .� ) � 19 n '1 .. (. ) � t -- t t t 1 X il w J 365
�� t to 332( t. 0 366
t 1 " Cu � tn e i m .i. tr t r tic. u it 1 th ot ee lon 331 or 'th m )� od. c t �u 367
1 '1 i!ltJ' .,., . i:J'., . . .,w , J....~r ~- ' til '1 .... 1 '1 , b ot tc ( 1 368 �
.. . t1 � d ... 369
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.