CTA Case No. 2336 (Decision)
w1 l I!P.IT \1 TC OF THE PHJLIPPJ~I�:S 't1t; WI' Of TAX APPEt\L8 QUbZON CITY -{J-. .I .' .ic:-1 .r, � ... I .... r .fu h.y jci ly t d n t bm tc � � 183
ri ... f ' r ~� ct r } th t; 4( ... l c - r tl a n }t d that life ~nstrrance 1 th 184
1 .d 0 t it' lJ. :;, t i 0 d0 t!:~ r !>Ol oyh v jU>'~i,. ed y th r:� eh co� f.i.!., ,...... 3 t 'l r lJ,fJ o.." s .'1!' d 1 1 a-.. d e . r ' o h l.nsu.runc . h r y~b un ta .h' . ) t eol ( 1 ...,( ) ( } r 1 ...in. ti � t. ( 1 ) t l1 c vit � ,f it 185
�r ;.f' t 1 1-f r f 0 :t t n (' ) y . co ti u l n- r or fl� l. 0! nt .... s or o d ..��(\ r - i i' 18 6
s~ 1 n. ~3 ? n!�. � l t ~ ?,p ~ 15, �;J e"!,r-nd~.ci by i\.ct !l ' � J"'\i(':# . Th f'i 1 t �\1 .� "bOt d .r ln 4- .. ~~ ;4 rri" e.. t < .t 0 1 Il tt! n t h. x ~ L-; ~ .,$CS . 1f~2 ( ~) ( ) t t} - U<" � od J _"/ 1 I rt .. no1 " 1 is a ~ 1- se �tl . t j . .r ":r + ti on �f ,; 1~ i!! r
eo ~ i :'\ L ! .. i... t;c. �.~ r-\,.o ... {C r gil.l ; � f 12 , �h 188
'7 r ./ \ nf'l~"" !: 1 .. (As t ~< .t1JH~ f"~w r Ce n t dl , l e . v .' .� (;ey..,.r�. s - t n :; ' > '.fl !' 11 .d on oy : d . ~c on . ect ' t~l t h t ...-i� ., ... b .. � o t � � n~ 1. t 'i1r;: r s.ul n t ~ cis ativ -~'' '. l t (t~ f.;� X S> . he gi fJ ti ~- nt t !a�' :tv!ty �J t I,;. 189 .
�/ ' �� / ., .. ' � � t �� 1� .t.$ sL;Lr4i ,-f, i.t:-. �' 19 0 �
t 1' f ....t .I - / �� 1 . '� t " " ? 191 t
.. , '"' f -. t (.0 .���.rc � !' 19 2 /
.. tl ':!~ . ~ 37 ., t6 ' � "J � 1' %:' ,' c 1. ~( (� f'T' ' ' '( . , l~r ~~oe~-.~, 't.' . . U." ' �� �tt :r .,... t �' rt 1f1 �Ct .v�� If ~ 1 1 0 'I> ~�~Je. ' CC�"11: t ";' .11 ' . (t,:) ... d' '� 1 � JJ 1 F 19 3
7 .. t :: f or th~"> -, � ":tt' ' <l.!tu:�.~ t to 1~�t' - .., � ...r_,') � �' t '"' j.. ~--.. ,~. ..... .... ' ""' 9,.�"' 'I !l 194
... ~ ._. )� � . \, ~ ut. !lv ~'?!""\ et o '-� ~"'� or sti'n _ .. . ~?'f" t''U h ~t !1 r, i"'JJ.t . n~i t '1er r: ..~i ....o, a, e.,.. 0' � r e:- Y' b~> , r~t nIt 1n ,r,; / t"n., ':'t t t;, f , t: . C" ,,_ .... t . . �, ~ .1( .._ � � f.o c 0 u � {'If-! t �r>~r .tl~ ~cr . .: eti � ~l 1 � 2( � )( 3H .::"":) , :a "e 9l"'~tdy .~ 'b 'r�ct ..' ' .".. 1�4 , 0S ('Id 1'1 . .t :ttl~ ' .;v~<'~ �� ,! c~: r ,. t- ~ <:! n~ ' W'J' h.y t .wLt:.i ,. ts ... n"'"' !1 ... t ' " , 195
"i . �,)ti.J- ..... .. �~ i+ ='3 t � .n '. , ,~. -~... l)f r~� ; � t . i er l,o.a,;f': � em , f ("'' � �;".�:,".;);111� .- .�-:":.l',l , u.,_,. t ,:.; rc s ��' t c h i t �<,l1 d �:'J t: 1 . � 1n a 196
!. ~ I c (, HEr>t1�JHnL'Tl'C OOFF, THE PHAIP.LPI PEPA1L.'lSr:..s � . -� t\. TAX QUE:'.ON CITY ' t' li' � ... 37 l '..~\ 1 - ... 1.9 7
DISSEf�fT J ... ., 198
DISSENT - ... ' , 19 9
DISSENT ... � 'Y 3
DISSENT .n I � "" t 1 t 2D1
DISSENT - .s .. 2\37 11 ,. t. ,. 202
DISSENT L~ 2.0'J)
DISSEN1' ... ' .. ,. i! 204
DISSENT � t;. .., ~ �~ "" l.' 1 205
�� � J0 () .. 206
/ � - � ,. 207
.. !) 208
1 � j - e) 1 1. 6110 1 ''* c r 5 ()~ ,s �t,,t 'l r ' � i~ 20 9
f 7 � tt, !'Jl:O J -~ l of t f.. \,.-) "' �'4- 0 e� t 0 t "4f 1 210
. :J 1 ~h .,. 1t t tio. 9 ..r t c . -10> 1 ~ y n C� 1. 1 .,..., 1, � o. 0 1 � j! t c b t. �' "' � �l ' � ;: 211
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ST. LUKE'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (Consolidated with EB 542)(CTA Case No. EB 538)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. INTERVET PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2693)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1145)
- CTA Case No. 5057 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5057)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 2389)
- CTA Case No. 4700 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4700)
- CTA Case No. 1752 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1752)
- CTA Case No. 135 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 135)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.