CTA Case No. 3990 (Resolution)
�e~OBUC OP 'tHE .-ruuPPti'V't 1..~0URT OF TAX APP�AL0 QtJ OK Clrv PEILIPI- I1~L PET.KO:;..,EUl'l -. '~ -" . ..::� . . C.:....:..I' !:C . 3990 CC2PCc., .TlON, Peti ti( ne1 , - versus - IN'.;_'} '.KI':�Jc\L REVJ.!J.'.JUE 1 Respondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X RE S CLU 2I 0 ~ Conside-in~ the f&ilure cf ~etiticner ' s counsel to ap ear c. t t .. e scl'eouled hearing c,f this c c:se on July 1 , 198 7 desp i te ?roper no~ice therecf , and the penden cy of the c ase s i nce Oc tober 18 , 198 5, this Court, u�,on verbe:.l mction of res_;)onr"ent, hereby orde r s the d i smissel of the abcve - cntl~led c ase for lack of interest on t e 9art tf 1Ptiti~ner to prose - SO c: .DER:!:;D . ~L.. ezc,n City , iv1etro Ii?nila , July 10, 1 987 . ~-i~2~iatj~ q Pres i --' i ng ,Judge
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.