[ G. R. No. 40917. August 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40917. August 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40917
[ G. R. No. 40917. August 11, 1934 ]
FELISA SANCHEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LEE HAP ET AL., DEFENDANTS, LEE HAP, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Tayabas_________, dated the _________25th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 115351. March 27, 1998 ](351 Phil. 467)
- G.R. No. 188376, December 14, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 119835. January 28, 1998 ](349 Phil. 141)
- G.R. No. 171503, June 08, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 11284. October 13, 1917 ](G.R. No. 11284)
- G.R. No. 128618, November 16, 1998
- [ G.R. No. L-40683. June 27, 1975 ](159-A Phil. 777; 71 OG 7370 (November, 1975))
- [ G.R. No. 228489. May 05, 2021 ](902 Phil. 120)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.