CTA Case No. 272 (Decision)
a~:; l'B' r � r , ...... " ' ''IlL '"'"'f!'I."Ea 1 co l.Jll J. ~! J:..ALS . 1\. .~.,u... A l l� J: y it � P��tJ.tion�r, - ven � .. � !'.A. � 2.72 - - - -- v T .1 0 CUST \~s~ - n t. �-f \ JC - - .. - - - .. - D CI ION ale f t � decision of es! a affi ng h� deci- si o t e c 1 ctor f uet � of h� ort f nil , whic or er the forf�1tuz� in f v r f te lie of the hillp inee of thirty-fou (~) pee a � e ntainln t on for al viol ion of Cent~al an Circular No. 44 , in elatlo t e- tion l363(f) of t e evi ed , dadnittrative Cod � The r cords of th e ent in at1on arrived t th ort of nila n o rd the � � w 1 ng � o. 947 , fr l n - ong on uly 23. 1~. It waa consigned to t Fan I~l cbinery eo., decl&red n Cust try No. 59 ( xh1 it "6 ) d ly a c anied c nsul r invoice o. 14 7 (Ex ibit "5�) co erci 1 o Etta Trading co., on kon9 � n Central Ban ele��� certifictt� f . o. ~/ 3837 (Ex ibite � � nt l� des.. c:r!bed � p 'G5. for pu oses of the co cd1t.y claa ific: tton of the ntr 1 nank waa classif1 d by etltioner ae :� 8 3
& � 272 fallin - 2- - �� er ~co dlty C o. by � custo � o x ination of h ship officer, 1t � o d t "aotan an w � cl � - alfi a ve er CotmliiOO � (UI). for �� 1 teized. - 1 th a izu~� ~ ce din �� h� �� re- lease t p t1t1oner t filin ety o. C-!:Am� f t u a ety c �� Inc. in t � ount f 2, .77. � �~in � the Collecto of at � f n11 � ril l.C . l � n hat he ch ndiae 1n q\& atJ.on � s b t t rfeitur f zo 11 v- l tion of Central nk Circ le � .._.� n elat1 ct1on l 3{f) oft n1�tr t!ve d o :rfel re t � l fv f u ic hili - ��l � t � dec111on of t � oll ct r o nJ.la ��� ef� 1rmed U. rc 2. ---� 1 ne� f ust �� t 11 etitlon � file t 1 stan l tio f I' � nly ts e here 1a her or e t 1 Y- in fou.r (84) ae � ta - y fall� de ty Cod , � )0 � t istic 1 Classifi t1o f � Centr 1 ant 1 - ent!n � �� nd ~ . s clai eel by nit1 r, o under - ity e o. (U ), a c ai by t e e - nt. .�
thr n d1 P ett1 n at 1 "� � t- liv n, tut of c� id nt1 1 f � .ln be � iz 8I Cuat 1 f r �� OVel' the z 1 �� t� it. to ne a eth �ot �a ( KiliO ~~ 1 Il � T. � �1 e� � h �ub- t 1 - 1 a Ci �- n" � 10 il at .1 olv i the ca� of F l J:'f .. va. �� � 4, l 7. . 2 � � p 1n �� ha �eo\ 9 ~ f 85
� 272 .� p ar tion, ls n n� E a e r .. aive el f � - ) n�r not � (in l r 1 rea t �> � :1n in � it � ( t1 1 c � ' cas II J er 1 ' fact t t th lett r f � T� P ., tral Cuat � d e I
/ � 272 - 5 .... th l � ... di r f cua states t t cl � ( 0..1'0<1 � 1 tlon of 1� co t �� r , 1 7. 7
More in CTA Decisions
- HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9393)
- VISAYAS GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7394)
- MANILA PENINSULA HOTEL, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1408)
- ACTUATE BUILDERS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9129)
- CTA Case No. 5954 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5954)
- NANOX PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8433)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NORTHERN TOBACCO REDRYING CO., INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1760)
- SCANDINAVIAN MOTORS CORPORATION v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7269)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.