CTA Case No. 2300 (Decision)
REPURT.TC OF THE PHTLTPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON Cn'Y c D l~1 ~ l. t 0 th~ su . .t� .~. e .... .n -~ 1; I c ., n t 23
1 rn ' ... :r b.r l' 't r � � rr d� on n � t I 1( (L 24
3 ti i .n . ~ 0 tt ,tltioo 1 .( ,)(3) � r) t t � 1. ~.. st<,.l� t t - ' t 0 . ttj h l th In ti t l'"aoti 1 �1d .nt all 11 t. r ud � t .n pr c ie 25
.. I 1 " t - � ' � � .. \ 26
5 t , 27
28 �
r I , . th1 .. ~Ol!W that 29
.... � t � 30
nr-c; srnn ... CT,.. CA~L R�1.f, 23iJi' 31
� 2 .. � 32
1t 33
ISl .. ... o,. 2 CA i 1 .t/ I. t h ' ~~ ~ � tn "*' d:.. 't . l tJ 0 R. 1 ion �. ��' 34
� REf'TTBf.TC OF THE PHILIPPi~ES CuliRT OF TAX APPE-ALS Qt.l�ZON CCJY 35
�- -- ... _ .:� 36
, t 37
c1 � 38
� 39
0 �� ', 40
It said: 41
� 42
43
� ) i sweeping .. 44
�~' l,... 1 1n 0 4�5�
~1 ,.lQ of.' 't r : . ctmon or h.Q. oU 46
1 47
j J � 48
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.