[ G. R. No. 41215. August 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41215. August 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41215
[ G. R. No. 41215. August 15, 1934 ]
DOLORES LOZADA VDA. DE QUIRINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.LI GIM, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________30th__________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instances against the defendant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff__________ recover from __________the defendant __________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 75342. March 15, 1990 ](262 Phil. 228)
- [ G.R. No. 2829. September 19, 1906 ](G.R. No. 2829)
- [ G.R. No. 178397. October 20, 2010 ](648 Phil. 494)
- [ G.R. No. 26398. April 02, 1927 ](G.R. No. 26398)
- [ G.R. No. 2782. June 04, 1906 ](G.R. No. 2782)
- [ G. R. No. L-16628. May 23, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. No. 31255. August 07, 1929 ](G.R. No. 31255)
- [ G.R. No. 247906. February 10, 2021 ](896 Phil. 700)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.