CTA Case No. 1330 (Decision)

j {j � ILl P J I 8 .fE ~ - ��� c ~ - 133 t' 1 19

( .. 2 - n�t t1 � 1ch 1 A 'b I ~ �' 1 n� ( � s. 7) ,, t ' � 0 � �1 1 ' C1 l - tn e 8 0 1 0 t s , le . c t -t - t 1 t � ' � tt J� wJ a ). l, c 1 1. a 4 1 �( � c � . � 1 "� '9 9� l' 9- 2 .) t tte 1 c � w r a ~ 6, 0 t er ( 1- ) t 1: � t r ' � ... � 9-l J:' ' .t ) I' 120

0 1 ..... -� l c s o. l l �0 2' 2, t is u d ains t1- � ��� 0 UA It tic � 7 Ol' 31J . 5S ( . b1 l:>' t � l 4 , . )J 2- ... t22l2- 2- ,.. � to 85 . , ( , ni . . �� � It, I - -59 tor 2lt � 5 ( 1 Te a � ii t r 1 1l 2, ' "l(ff pp . . � 1 5-18 � r A t yb 4 �h r on .. ' I' 2 19 2 ( ~xn .. 1 t h.e pr rt1� r t 1 l.i ot �t- 1 1 l �� tl ~ 0 � ( hb ucu C"- 5.. ' eoln Coll 1 oe th co r; d .rc on- t, ed1 t. d x url e catio ' i~ r 1 in � o t � b n t1t ot 1 ... vi u 1, tore 1 t, 1l'1 t e or ar t t ln o � ot ln Colle 1 t � a� 11 t b. t � in qu t1 n a 12:t

-- / � �� � h t a I ' .. � - � t � , � � !' 1 22